The grievance body of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority cannot reevaluate its previous order under the guise of discussing its minutes: Bombay High Court

Case: Sitara Anil Sharma v. Apex Grievance Redressal Committee, Slum Rehabilitation Authority, Bandra, Mumbai & Ors.

Coram: Justice Madhav J Jamdar

Case No: Writ Petition No. 15250 of 2023

Court Observation: “it is a settled legal proposition that unless the Statute/Rules so permit, a Review Application is not maintainable in case of judicial/quasi judicial Orders. What has been done by the AGRC is that under the guise of styling the Order as speaking to the minutes of Order passed on 28th June 2023, the Order is effectively reviewed”

Previous Posts

FIRs in rape cases involving minors are not mere printed papers; rather, they reflect the profound trauma experienced by the victims: Delhi High Court

Kalamassery Bomb Blasts | Kerala High Court Orders the Transfer of Zamra Convention Centre to Its Managing Director

While the Railway Vigilance Manual is procedural, its significance should not be disregarded, as it serves to protect employees from false implications: Andhra Pradesh High Court

A person who has migrated to another state shall only be entitled to the benefit of reservation in the state of their origin: Jharkhand High Court

Gauhati High Court orders the Assam Police to pay ₹5 lakh in compensation to an advocate for handcuffing him without just cause

Keywords

The grievance body of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority,