Advocate Who Voluntarily Suspended Legal Practice for Govt Employment No Longer a Member of the Bar: Kerala High Court

Advocate Who Voluntarily Suspended Legal Practice for Govt Employment No Longer a Member of the Bar

Case: Saumya M.S. v. State of Kerala & Ors

Coram: Justice Alexander Thomas and Justice Viju Abraham

Case No.: OP(KAT) NO. 39 OF 2022

Court Observation: So the inevitable consequence of the statutory provisions is that the said person, who has initially secured enrollment with the State Bar Council and who later secured voluntary suspension of legal practice, consequent to taking up of employment, including public employment, will cease to have the right to be an Advocate or to practise as an Advocate, so long as the voluntary suspension is in force.

“So long as a person like the applicant does not have the legal right to practise as an Advocate in terms of Secs.30 and 33 of the Act, in view of the abovesaid aspects and the consequences flowing from the Act and the Rules, it cannot be said that such a person should be a member of the Bar.”

Previous Posts

No Show Cause Notice Issued Along With Draft Assessment Order: Gujarat High Court Quashes Section 144B Order

Jammu & Kashmir & Ladakh HC Quashes PSA Detention Order Passed Against Don Bakra Murder Case Convict Rajesh Dogra

Appointment Not an Indefeasible Right but State Can’t Be Arbitrary: Gujarat High Court Imposes ₹50,000 Cost

Allahabad HC Relies upon Wifes Extra-Judicial Confession to Confirm Life Sentence Awarded To Her, 2 Others for Killing Husband

Bombay High Court Orders 7 Days Jail For Prison Superintendent For Denying Emergency Parole To Eligible Prisoners

Courts to Ignore Violation of Principles of Natural Justice If Only One Outcome Is Possible in Facts of the Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court

No COVID Patient Should Be Denied Hospital Admission For Lack Of Local Address Proof Download Judgement

Keywords

Voluntarily Suspended Legal Practice