FIR can be quashed under Writ Jurisdiction of Article 226, If It Is Found to Be Abuse of Process of Law

  • Post category:Daily Judgments
  • Reading time:5 mins read

FIR can be quashed under Writ Jurisdiction of Article 226, If It Is Found to Be Abuse of Process of Law

Case: Kapil Agarwal vs. Sanjay Sharma

Coram: Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah

Case No: [Cr. A 142 OF 2021]

Court Observation: “If the subsequent FIR is an abuse of process of law and/or the same has been lodged only to harass the accused, the same can be quashed in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution or in the exercise of powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

When the Court is satisfied that criminal proceedings amount to an abuse of process of law or that it amounts to bringing pressure upon the accused, in the exercise of inherent powers, such proceedings can be quashed. As held by this Court in the case of Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641, Section 482 Cr.P.C. is prefaced with an overriding provision.

The statute saves the inherent power of the High Court, as a superior court, to make such orders as are necessary (i) to prevent abuse of the process of any Court; or (ii) otherwise to secure the ends of justice. Same are the powers with the High Court when it exercises the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution.”, the bench said.

“Thus, as per Section 210 Cr.P.C., when in a case instituted otherwise than on a police report, i.e., in a complaint case, during the course of the inquiry or trial held by the Magistrate, it appears to the Magistrate that an investigation by the police is in progress in relation to the offense which is the subject matter of the inquiry or trial held by him, the Magistrate shall stay the proceedings of such inquiry or trial and call for a report on the matter from the police officer conducting the investigation.

It also provides that if a report is made by the investigating police officer under Section 173 Cr.P.C. and on such report cognizance of any offence is taken by the Magistrate against any person who is an accused in the complaint case, the Magistrate shall inquire into or try together the complaint case and the case arising out of the police report as if both the cases were instituted on a police report.

It also further provides that if the police report does not relate to any accused in the complaint case or if the Magistrate does not take cognizance of any offense on the police report, he shall proceed with the inquiry or trial, which was stayed by him, in accordance with the provisions of Cr. P.C. Thus, merely because on the same set of facts with the same allegations and averments earlier the complaint is filed, there is no bar to lodge the FIR with the police station with the same allegations and averments.”, the court added.

[doc id=3779]

Previous Posts

Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Corporate Debtor For Cheque Dishonour is Covered Under Section 14 IBC

Punjab And Haryana HC Upholds Daughter’s Custody With Mother

Ossification Test Conducted On An Accused Cannot Be Conclusive To Declare Him As A Juvenile On The Date Of The Incident if His Age Around 40-55 Years

Allegations By Wife Affecting Career & Reputation Of Husband Amounts To Mental Cruelty: A Ground For Seeking Divorce

Fee Charged By Private Medical Colleges Should Neither Be Excessive Nor Exploitative, Duty Of Admission & Fee Regulatory Committee To Ensure That Download Judgement


Writ Jurisdiction, Article 226