“Alleged Offence Grave But Trial Would Take Ample Time”: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Three Officials Accused In Biocon Bribery Case

“Alleged Offence Grave But Trial Would Take Ample Time”: Delhi High Court Grants Bail To Three Officials Accused In Biocon Bribery Case

Case: Dr. L. Praveen Kumar V. Central Bureau Of Investigation

Coram: Justice Anu Malhotra

Case No.: BAIL APPLN. 2202/2022

Court Observation: “….though undoubtedly the offence alleged to have been committed (if proved) by the applicants is grave, the trial in the matter would take ample time.”

“…there is nothing to indicate that despite the recommendation made by the Special Expert Committee for waiver of Phase-III clinical trial in the country to M/s Biocon Biologics to import and market Insulin Aspart Injection for the treatment of the diabetic condition subject to the condition that the Phase-IV clinical trial in India would be conducted which also includes a sub-set population to generate pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and immunogenicity and to submit the protocol to CDSCO before placing the drug in the market as per guidelines in the country that the said recommendation of the SEC has so far been approved and given effect to by the Drug Controller General of India of the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization.”

“Though the public health would undoubtedly amount to an issue in relation to the public emergency or the existence of a public safety interest, there is nothing presently placed on record to indicate the invocation of Section 5(2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 by the CBI, “

Previous Posts

Section 239 CrPC – Court Can Only Look Into Prima Facie Case & Decide Whether Prosecution Case Is Groundless: Supreme Court

Sec 125 CrPC | Muslim Husband Cannot Avoid His Liability To Maintain Unless Divorce Is Validly Pronounced And Properly Communicated: J&K&L High Court

O. 6 R. 17 CPC | Amendment To Election Petition Can’t Be Permitted To Cure ‘Inherent Defect’ After Expiry Of Limitation Period: Orissa High Court

Municipal Corporation Constituted For Providing Basic Public Goods Cannot Shirk Off Responsibility By Citing Financial Constraints: Delhi High Court

Pendency Of Prosecution No Bar To An Order Of Preventive Detention: J&K&L High Court

‘Hurried Invocation Of Art 311(2)(b)’: Calcutta High Court Quashes A Dismissal Order For Want Of Reasons For Dispensing With Inquiry

Keywords

Accused In Biocon Bribery Case, Grants Bail