Grave Misconduct: Rajasthan HC Imposes 1 Lac Cost On Advocate Who Filed Original Application Without Authorization, Superimposed Sign By Xerox Machine Etc. - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Grave Misconduct: Rajasthan HC Imposes 1 Lac Cost On Advocate Who Filed Original Application Without Authorization, Superimposed Sign By Xerox Machine Etc.

Grave Misconduct: Rajasthan HC Imposes 1 Lac Cost On Advocate Who Filed Original Application Without Authorization, Superimposed Sign By Xerox Machine Etc. Case: T.C. Gupta…

Continue ReadingGrave Misconduct: Rajasthan HC Imposes 1 Lac Cost On Advocate Who Filed Original Application Without Authorization, Superimposed Sign By Xerox Machine Etc.
Gratuity Can Be Forfeited If Employee Terminated For Causing Damage to Employer Property, Forfeiture Not To Exceed Extent of Loss: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Gratuity Can Be Forfeited If Employee Terminated For Causing Damage to Employer Property, Forfeiture Not To Exceed Extent of Loss: Delhi HC

Gratuity Can Be Forfeited If Employee Terminated For Causing Damage to Employer's Property, Forfeiture Not To Exceed Extent of Loss Case: Union Bank Of India…

Continue ReadingGratuity Can Be Forfeited If Employee Terminated For Causing Damage to Employer Property, Forfeiture Not To Exceed Extent of Loss: Delhi HC
Persons Who Purchased a Portion of Paddy Land after Commencement of Act Cant Reclaim It For Residential Use: Kerala High Court Overrules Earlier Precedent - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Persons Who Purchased a Portion of Paddy Land after Commencement of Act Cant Reclaim It For Residential Use: Kerala High Court Overrules Earlier Precedent

Persons Who Purchased a Portion of Paddy Land after Commencement of Act Cant Reclaim It For Residential Use: Kerala High Court Overrules Earlier Precedent Case:…

Continue ReadingPersons Who Purchased a Portion of Paddy Land after Commencement of Act Cant Reclaim It For Residential Use: Kerala High Court Overrules Earlier Precedent
Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Can't Always Be Denied Only Because Of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court - the Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Can’t Always Be Denied Only Because Of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court

Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Can't Always Be Denied Only Because Of Section 33(5), POCSO Act Case: Mohit v. State of Uttarakhand Coram: Acting…

Continue ReadingRight of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Can’t Always Be Denied Only Because Of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court
Employee Can't Be Terminated From Service Despite Conviction By Court In Absence Of Show Cause Notice & Opportunity To Reply: Gujarat High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Employee Can’t Be Terminated From Service Despite Conviction By Court In Absence Of Show Cause Notice & Opportunity To Reply: Gujarat High Court

Employee Can't Be Terminated From Service Despite Conviction By Court In Absence Of Show Cause Notice & Opportunity To Reply Case: Ramsingbhai Saburbhai Patel vs…

Continue ReadingEmployee Can’t Be Terminated From Service Despite Conviction By Court In Absence Of Show Cause Notice & Opportunity To Reply: Gujarat High Court
Will Can't Be Used As Evidence without Examining Attesting Witness Even If opposite Party Doesn't Deny its Execution: Madras High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Will Can’t Be Used As Evidence without Examining Attesting Witness Even If opposite Party Doesn’t Deny its Execution: Madras High Court

Will Can't Be Used As Evidence without Examining Attesting Witness Even If opposite Party Doesn't Deny its Execution Case: Malliga v. P. Kumaran Coram: Justice…

Continue ReadingWill Can’t Be Used As Evidence without Examining Attesting Witness Even If opposite Party Doesn’t Deny its Execution: Madras High Court
Enforcement Directorate Exempted From RTI Act except When Information Relates to Allegations of Corruption or Human Rights Violation: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Enforcement Directorate Exempted From RTI Act except When Information Relates to Allegations of Corruption or Human Rights Violation: Delhi HC

Enforcement Directorate Exempted From RTI Act except When Information Relates to Allegations of Corruption or Human Rights Violation Case: Union Of India V. Central Information…

Continue ReadingEnforcement Directorate Exempted From RTI Act except When Information Relates to Allegations of Corruption or Human Rights Violation: Delhi HC
Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Can Be Granted In Exceptional Circumstances; Environment Protection Act Doesn't Prohibit It: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Can Be Granted In Exceptional Circumstances; Environment Protection Act Doesn’t Prohibit It: Supreme Court

Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Can Be Granted In Exceptional Circumstances; Environment Protection Act Doesn't Prohibit It Case: Pahwa Plastics Pvt. Ltd vs Dastak NGO…

Continue ReadingEx Post Facto Environmental Clearance Can Be Granted In Exceptional Circumstances; Environment Protection Act Doesn’t Prohibit It: Supreme Court
Article 22(5) | Detenue Must Be Conveyed Time-Limit Within Which He Can Make Representation Against Detention: J&K&L High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Article 22(5) | Detenue Must Be Conveyed Time-Limit Within Which He Can Make Representation Against Detention: J&K&L High Court

Article 22(5) | Detenue Must Be Conveyed 'Time-Limit' Within Which He Can Make Representation Against Detention Case: Tariq Ahmed v. Union Territory of J &…

Continue ReadingArticle 22(5) | Detenue Must Be Conveyed Time-Limit Within Which He Can Make Representation Against Detention: J&K&L High Court
Gujarat High Court Distinguished Between Public Order and Law and Order; Releases Detenue under NDPS Act - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Gujarat High Court Distinguished Between Public Order and Law and Order; Releases Detenue under NDPS Act

Gujarat High Court Distinguished Between Public Order and Law and Order; Releases Detenue under NDPS Act Case: Manoj @ Munnabhai Ashwinbhai Somabhai Parmar Versus Director…

Continue ReadingGujarat High Court Distinguished Between Public Order and Law and Order; Releases Detenue under NDPS Act
Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Cant Always Be Denied Only Because of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Cant Always Be Denied Only Because of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court

Right of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Cant Always Be Denied Only Because of Section 33(5), POCSO Act Case: Mohit v. State of Uttarakhand Coram: Acting…

Continue ReadingRight of Accused to Cross-Examine Prosecutrix Cant Always Be Denied Only Because of Section 33(5), POCSO Act: Uttarakhand High Court
Article 226 - High Court Cannot Direct Regularisation of Temporary Employees by Creating Supernumerary Posts: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Article 226 – High Court Cannot Direct Regularisation of Temporary Employees by Creating Supernumerary Posts: Supreme Court

Article 226 - High Court Cannot Direct Regularisation of Temporary Employees by Creating Supernumerary Posts Case: State of Gujarat vs R.J. Pathan Coram: Justices MR…

Continue ReadingArticle 226 – High Court Cannot Direct Regularisation of Temporary Employees by Creating Supernumerary Posts: Supreme Court
Claim U/s 163A Of MV Act Not Maintainable Against Owner/Insurer Without Third-Party Involvement When Injured Was Driving The Vehicle: Madras HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Claim U/s 163A Of MV Act Not Maintainable Against Owner/Insurer Without Third-Party Involvement When Injured Was Driving The Vehicle: Madras HC

Claim U/s 163A Of MV Act Not Maintainable Against Owner/Insurer Without Third-Party Involvement When Injured Was Driving The Vehicle Case: The Divisional Manager, TATA AIG…

Continue ReadingClaim U/s 163A Of MV Act Not Maintainable Against Owner/Insurer Without Third-Party Involvement When Injured Was Driving The Vehicle: Madras HC
Family Courts Act Not All Transactions With In-Laws Qualify As Circumstance Arising Out Of Marital Relationship: Kerala High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Family Courts Act Not All Transactions With In-Laws Qualify As Circumstance Arising Out Of Marital Relationship: Kerala High Court

Family Courts Act Not All Transactions With In-Laws Qualify As Circumstance Arising Out Of Marital Relationship Case: P.T. Philipose & Anr. v. Sunil Jacob &…

Continue ReadingFamily Courts Act Not All Transactions With In-Laws Qualify As Circumstance Arising Out Of Marital Relationship: Kerala High Court
Nothing Short Of Ridiculing Their Powers: Kerala High Court Denies CBI Probe For Not Approaching Statutory Authorities First - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Nothing Short Of Ridiculing Their Powers: Kerala High Court Denies CBI Probe For Not Approaching Statutory Authorities First

Nothing Short Of Ridiculing Their Powers: Kerala High Court Denies CBI Probe For Not Approaching Statutory Authorities First Case: Western Ghats Protection Council v Union…

Continue ReadingNothing Short Of Ridiculing Their Powers: Kerala High Court Denies CBI Probe For Not Approaching Statutory Authorities First
On Last Day As Bombay HC Judge, Justice SJ Kathawalla Orders ₹10 Crore Interim Compensation For 953 Fisherfolk Families Affected By Infra Project - The Law COmmunicants
The Law Communicants

On Last Day As Bombay HC Judge, Justice SJ Kathawalla Orders ₹10 Crore Interim Compensation For 953 Fisherfolk Families Affected By Infra Project

On Last Day As Bombay HC Judge, Justice SJ Kathawalla Orders ₹10 Crore Interim Compensation For 953 Fisherfolk Families Affected By Infra Project Case: Mariyayi…

Continue ReadingOn Last Day As Bombay HC Judge, Justice SJ Kathawalla Orders ₹10 Crore Interim Compensation For 953 Fisherfolk Families Affected By Infra Project
Framing Of Charge- Probative Value Of Materials Cannot Be Gone Into, Material Brought On Record By Prosecution To Be Accepted As True: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Framing Of Charge- Probative Value Of Materials Cannot Be Gone Into, Material Brought On Record By Prosecution To Be Accepted As True: Delhi HC

Framing Of Charge- Probative Value Of Materials Cannot Be Gone Into, Material Brought On Record By Prosecution To Be Accepted As True Case: Settu V.…

Continue ReadingFraming Of Charge- Probative Value Of Materials Cannot Be Gone Into, Material Brought On Record By Prosecution To Be Accepted As True: Delhi HC
Short Term Permit For Extraction Of Minor Minerals Can Be Granted On Application Made To Competent Authority, Public Auction Not Required: Bombay HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Short Term Permit For Extraction Of Minor Minerals Can Be Granted On Application Made To Competent Authority, Public Auction Not Required: Bombay HC

Short Term Permit For Extraction Of Minor Minerals Can Be Granted On Application Made To Competent Authority, Public Auction Not Required Case: Shrikrupa Stone Crusher…

Continue ReadingShort Term Permit For Extraction Of Minor Minerals Can Be Granted On Application Made To Competent Authority, Public Auction Not Required: Bombay HC
Bank Entitled To Proceed U/S 13 SARFAESI Act Notwithstanding That Debt Portfolio Was Assigned To It By NBFC: Bombay High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Bank Entitled To Proceed U/S 13 SARFAESI Act Notwithstanding That Debt Portfolio Was Assigned To It By NBFC: Bombay High Court

Bank Entitled To Proceed U/S 13 SARFAESI Act Notwithstanding That Debt Portfolio Was Assigned To It By NBFC Case: Poorti Rent a Car and Logistics…

Continue ReadingBank Entitled To Proceed U/S 13 SARFAESI Act Notwithstanding That Debt Portfolio Was Assigned To It By NBFC: Bombay High Court
Acquittal of Delinquent Employee in a Criminal Case Does Not Debar Employer from Proceeding with Disciplinary Enquiry: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Acquittal of Delinquent Employee in a Criminal Case Does Not Debar Employer from Proceeding with Disciplinary Enquiry: Supreme Court

Acquittal of Delinquent Employee in a Criminal Case Does Not Debar Employer from Proceeding with Disciplinary Enquiry Case: State of Karnataka vs Umesh Coram: Justices…

Continue ReadingAcquittal of Delinquent Employee in a Criminal Case Does Not Debar Employer from Proceeding with Disciplinary Enquiry: Supreme Court
Order Allowing Review Petition Must Be Speaking & Reasoned Order As To What Was The Error Apparent On The Face Of Record: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Order Allowing Review Petition Must Be Speaking & Reasoned Order As To What Was The Error Apparent On The Face Of Record: Supreme Court

Order Allowing Review Petition Must Be Speaking & Reasoned Order As To What Was The Error Apparent On The Face Of Record Case: Ratan Lal…

Continue ReadingOrder Allowing Review Petition Must Be Speaking & Reasoned Order As To What Was The Error Apparent On The Face Of Record: Supreme Court
Regional Labour Commissioner Cannot Exercise Adjudicatory Powers In Proceedings Under Sec. 33(1) Of Industrial Disputes Act: Delhi High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Regional Labour Commissioner Cannot Exercise Adjudicatory Powers In Proceedings Under Sec. 33(1) Of Industrial Disputes Act: Delhi High Court

Regional Labour Commissioner Cannot Exercise Adjudicatory Powers In Proceedings Under Sec. 33(1) Of Industrial Disputes Act Case: Garrison Engineer (Central), Delhi Cantt V. M.J. Prasad…

Continue ReadingRegional Labour Commissioner Cannot Exercise Adjudicatory Powers In Proceedings Under Sec. 33(1) Of Industrial Disputes Act: Delhi High Court
SARFAESI Rajasthan HC Imposes 2Lac Cost For Misrepresentation, Not Availing Alternative Remedy, Not Impleading Necessary Parties & For Keeping Court In Dark - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

SARFAESI Rajasthan HC Imposes 2Lac Cost For Misrepresentation, Not Availing Alternative Remedy, Not Impleading Necessary Parties & For Keeping Court In Dark

SARFAESI Rajasthan HC Imposes 2Lac Cost For Misrepresentation, Not Availing Alternative Remedy, Not Impleading Necessary Parties & For Keeping Court In Dark Case: Jaipur Texweaving…

Continue ReadingSARFAESI Rajasthan HC Imposes 2Lac Cost For Misrepresentation, Not Availing Alternative Remedy, Not Impleading Necessary Parties & For Keeping Court In Dark
Non Placing & Non Consideration Of Bail Order Vitiates Detaining Authority Subjective Decision: Tripura HC Sets Aside Detention Order - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Non Placing & Non Consideration Of Bail Order Vitiates Detaining Authority Subjective Decision: Tripura HC Sets Aside Detention Order

Non Placing & Non Consideration Of Bail Order Vitiates Detaining Authority Subjective Decision: Tripura HC Sets Aside Detention Order Case: Bishu Kumar Tripura v. State…

Continue ReadingNon Placing & Non Consideration Of Bail Order Vitiates Detaining Authority Subjective Decision: Tripura HC Sets Aside Detention Order