Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Details Of SC Collegiums December 2018 Meeting - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

‘Reason To Believe’ Sufficient To Issue Notice U/S 148 Income Tax Act, Sufficiency/Correctness Of Material Not Considered At This Stage: Delhi HC

'Reason To Believe' Sufficient To Issue Notice U/S 148 Income Tax Act, Sufficiency/Correctness Of Material Not Considered At This Stage: Delhi HC Case: SAIF II…

Continue Reading‘Reason To Believe’ Sufficient To Issue Notice U/S 148 Income Tax Act, Sufficiency/Correctness Of Material Not Considered At This Stage: Delhi HC
Order 38 Rule 5 CPC Suit Property Cant Be Attached Mechanically Or Merely For Asking Of Plaintiff: Delhi High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Claims Raised Before The Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Be Rejected Even If Not Mentioned In The Notice Issued Under Section 21 Of The A&C Act: Delhi High Court

Claims Raised Before The Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Be Rejected Even If Not Mentioned In The Notice Issued Under Section 21 Of The A&C Act: Delhi…

Continue ReadingClaims Raised Before The Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Be Rejected Even If Not Mentioned In The Notice Issued Under Section 21 Of The A&C Act: Delhi High Court
Registration of FIR by Itself Cant Have Any Nexus with Breach of Maintenance of Public Order: Gujarat High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Gujarat High Court Increases Motor Accident Compensation; Includes Loss of Amenities, Functional Disability in Computation

Gujarat High Court Increases Motor Accident Compensation; Includes Loss of Amenities, Functional Disability In Computation Case: Ishwarlal Kasturlal Pandya vs Ibrahimbhai Farukdin VohraCoram: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP…

Continue ReadingGujarat High Court Increases Motor Accident Compensation; Includes Loss of Amenities, Functional Disability in Computation
Pepsi's Tagline "Stimulates Mind, Energizes Body" is Prima Facie Not Similar to Redbull's "Vitalizes Body And Mind": Delhi High Court

Pepsi’s Tagline “Stimulates Mind, Energizes Body” is Prima Facie Not Similar to Redbull’s “Vitalizes Body And Mind”: Delhi High Court

Pepsi's Tagline "Stimulates Mind, Energizes Body" Is Prima Facie Not Similar To Redbull's "Vitalizes Body And Mind": Delhi High Court Case: Red Bull AG v PepsiCo…

Continue ReadingPepsi’s Tagline “Stimulates Mind, Energizes Body” is Prima Facie Not Similar to Redbull’s “Vitalizes Body And Mind”: Delhi High Court
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of the Rajasthan Schools (Regulation of Fee) Act; Reads Down Sections 4, 7 and 10 - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Scholarship By Hamdard Foundation, Exemption Under Income Tax Act Can’t Be Denied: Delhi High Court

Scholarship By Hamdard Foundation, Exemption Under Income Tax Act Can't Be Denied: Delhi High Court Case: Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi versus Hamdard National Foundation…

Continue ReadingScholarship By Hamdard Foundation, Exemption Under Income Tax Act Can’t Be Denied: Delhi High Court
Breach Of Contract U/S 74 Not Applicable At Pre-Formation Stage: Delhi High Court Directs State to Refund ₹20 Crore Forfeited Amount - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Breach Of Contract U/S 74 Not Applicable At Pre-Formation Stage: Delhi High Court Directs State to Refund ₹20 Crore Forfeited Amount

Breach Of Contract U/S 74 Not Applicable At Pre-Formation Stage: Delhi High Court Directs State to Refund ₹20 Crore Forfeited Amount Case: The Indian Hotels…

Continue ReadingBreach Of Contract U/S 74 Not Applicable At Pre-Formation Stage: Delhi High Court Directs State to Refund ₹20 Crore Forfeited Amount
Order XI CPC | Application for Leave to Serve Interrogatories Need Not Be Decided Ex-Parte, Court Can Issue Notice On Opposite Party: Delhi High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Order XI CPC | Application for Leave to Serve Interrogatories Need Not Be Decided Ex-Parte, Court Can Issue Notice On Opposite Party: Delhi High Court

Order XI CPC | Application for Leave to Serve Interrogatories Need Not Be Decided Ex-Parte, Court Can Issue Notice On Opposite Party Case: Mamta V.…

Continue ReadingOrder XI CPC | Application for Leave to Serve Interrogatories Need Not Be Decided Ex-Parte, Court Can Issue Notice On Opposite Party: Delhi High Court
NOC Given By Complainant & Fact That She Turned Hostile Does Not Waive Off Offence Alleged: Delhi High Court Refuses To Quash Rape FIR - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

NOC Given By Complainant & Fact That She Turned Hostile Does Not Waive Off Offence Alleged: Delhi High Court Refuses To Quash Rape FIR

NOC Given By Complainant & Fact That She Turned Hostile Does Not Waive Off Offence Alleged: Delhi High Court Refuses To Quash Rape FIR Case:…

Continue ReadingNOC Given By Complainant & Fact That She Turned Hostile Does Not Waive Off Offence Alleged: Delhi High Court Refuses To Quash Rape FIR
No Claim Certificate (NCC) Must Be Examined in the Context of Relevant Documents and the Covering Letter under Which It Is Issued: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

No Claim Certificate (NCC) Must Be Examined in the Context of Relevant Documents and the Covering Letter under Which It Is Issued: Delhi HC

No Claim Certificate (NCC) Must Be Examined in the Context of Relevant Documents and the Covering Letter under Which It Is Issued Case: IRCON International…

Continue ReadingNo Claim Certificate (NCC) Must Be Examined in the Context of Relevant Documents and the Covering Letter under Which It Is Issued: Delhi HC
As Is Where is in a License Agreement Does Not Absolve the Contracting Parties to Make a Minimal Disclosure: Delhi High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

As Is Where is in a License Agreement Does Not Absolve the Contracting Parties to Make a Minimal Disclosure: Delhi High Court

As Is Where is in a License Agreement Does Not Absolve the Contracting Parties to Make a Minimal Disclosure Case: India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd…

Continue ReadingAs Is Where is in a License Agreement Does Not Absolve the Contracting Parties to Make a Minimal Disclosure: Delhi High Court
No Distinction between Decree or Awards Where Amounts Are In Foreign Currencies For Purposes Of Enforcement Of Arbitral Award: Delhi High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

No Distinction between Decree or Awards Where Amounts Are In Foreign Currencies For Purposes Of Enforcement Of Arbitral Award: Delhi High Court

No Distinction between Decree or Awards Where Amounts Are In Foreign Currencies For Purposes Of Enforcement Of Arbitral Award Case: Karam Chand Thapar & Bros.…

Continue ReadingNo Distinction between Decree or Awards Where Amounts Are In Foreign Currencies For Purposes Of Enforcement Of Arbitral Award: Delhi High Court
Framing of Charges | Investigation into Offence & Elaborate Appreciation of Evidence Discouraged, Only Prima Facie Material Significant: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Framing of Charges | Investigation into Offence & Elaborate Appreciation of Evidence Discouraged, Only Prima Facie Material Significant: Delhi HC

Framing of Charges | Investigation into Offence & Elaborate Appreciation of Evidence Discouraged, Only Prima Facie Material Significant Case: Central Bureau Of Investigation V. Prem…

Continue ReadingFraming of Charges | Investigation into Offence & Elaborate Appreciation of Evidence Discouraged, Only Prima Facie Material Significant: Delhi HC
Non-Specification Of Penalty Provisions In Penalty Notice And Denial Of Immunity; Delhi High Court Holds That Assessee Is Eligible For Immunity, Says Tax Payer Should Be Incentivised - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Non-Specification Of Penalty Provisions In Penalty Notice And Denial Of Immunity; Delhi High Court Holds That Assessee Is Eligible For Immunity, Says Tax Payer Should Be Incentivised

Non-Specification Of Penalty Provisions In Penalty Notice And Denial Of Immunity; Delhi High Court Holds That Assessee Is Eligible For Immunity, Says Tax Payer Should…

Continue ReadingNon-Specification Of Penalty Provisions In Penalty Notice And Denial Of Immunity; Delhi High Court Holds That Assessee Is Eligible For Immunity, Says Tax Payer Should Be Incentivised
No Call to Have Expert Witness to Testify to Use of Identical Mark in Registered Trademark Infringement or Passing off Cases: Delhi High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

No Call to Have Expert Witness to Testify to Use of Identical Mark in Registered Trademark Infringement or Passing off Cases: Delhi High Court

No Call to Have Expert Witness to Testify to Use of Identical Mark in Registered Trademark Infringement or Passing off Cases Case: Burberry Ltd V.…

Continue ReadingNo Call to Have Expert Witness to Testify to Use of Identical Mark in Registered Trademark Infringement or Passing off Cases: Delhi High Court
Stand of Defendant Irrelevant When Court Is Dealing With Application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC: Delhi High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Stand of Defendant Irrelevant When Court Is Dealing With Application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC: Delhi High Court

Stand of Defendant Irrelevant When Court Is Dealing With Application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC Case: Puja Aggarwal V. Pravesh Narula Coram: Justice…

Continue ReadingStand of Defendant Irrelevant When Court Is Dealing With Application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC: Delhi High Court
CPC Second Appeal Can't Interfere With Orders Solely On Ground of Sympathy, Substantial Question of Law Must: Delhi High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

CPC Second Appeal Can’t Interfere With Orders Solely On Ground of Sympathy, Substantial Question of Law Must: Delhi High Court

CPC Second Appeal Can't Interfere With Orders Solely On Ground of Sympathy, Substantial Question of Law Must Case: Bhagwan Singh V. Delhi Development Authority &…

Continue ReadingCPC Second Appeal Can’t Interfere With Orders Solely On Ground of Sympathy, Substantial Question of Law Must: Delhi High Court
Gratuity Can Be Forfeited If Employee Terminated For Causing Damage to Employer Property, Forfeiture Not To Exceed Extent of Loss: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Gratuity Can Be Forfeited If Employee Terminated For Causing Damage to Employer Property, Forfeiture Not To Exceed Extent of Loss: Delhi HC

Gratuity Can Be Forfeited If Employee Terminated For Causing Damage to Employer's Property, Forfeiture Not To Exceed Extent of Loss Case: Union Bank Of India…

Continue ReadingGratuity Can Be Forfeited If Employee Terminated For Causing Damage to Employer Property, Forfeiture Not To Exceed Extent of Loss: Delhi HC
Enforcement Directorate Exempted From RTI Act except When Information Relates to Allegations of Corruption or Human Rights Violation: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Enforcement Directorate Exempted From RTI Act except When Information Relates to Allegations of Corruption or Human Rights Violation: Delhi HC

Enforcement Directorate Exempted From RTI Act except When Information Relates to Allegations of Corruption or Human Rights Violation Case: Union Of India V. Central Information…

Continue ReadingEnforcement Directorate Exempted From RTI Act except When Information Relates to Allegations of Corruption or Human Rights Violation: Delhi HC
Framing Of Charge- Probative Value Of Materials Cannot Be Gone Into, Material Brought On Record By Prosecution To Be Accepted As True: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Framing Of Charge- Probative Value Of Materials Cannot Be Gone Into, Material Brought On Record By Prosecution To Be Accepted As True: Delhi HC

Framing Of Charge- Probative Value Of Materials Cannot Be Gone Into, Material Brought On Record By Prosecution To Be Accepted As True Case: Settu V.…

Continue ReadingFraming Of Charge- Probative Value Of Materials Cannot Be Gone Into, Material Brought On Record By Prosecution To Be Accepted As True: Delhi HC
Regional Labour Commissioner Cannot Exercise Adjudicatory Powers In Proceedings Under Sec. 33(1) Of Industrial Disputes Act: Delhi High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Regional Labour Commissioner Cannot Exercise Adjudicatory Powers In Proceedings Under Sec. 33(1) Of Industrial Disputes Act: Delhi High Court

Regional Labour Commissioner Cannot Exercise Adjudicatory Powers In Proceedings Under Sec. 33(1) Of Industrial Disputes Act Case: Garrison Engineer (Central), Delhi Cantt V. M.J. Prasad…

Continue ReadingRegional Labour Commissioner Cannot Exercise Adjudicatory Powers In Proceedings Under Sec. 33(1) Of Industrial Disputes Act: Delhi High Court
Armed Forces Tribunal Act Excludes Administrative Supervision of High Court But Not Judicial Superintendence & Jurisdiction U/A 226: Delhi HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Armed Forces Tribunal Act Excludes Administrative Supervision of High Court But Not Judicial Superintendence & Jurisdiction U/A 226: Delhi HC

Armed Forces Tribunal Act Excludes Administrative Supervision of High Court But Not Judicial Superintendence & Jurisdiction U/A 226 Case: Wing Commander Shyam Naithani V. Union…

Continue ReadingArmed Forces Tribunal Act Excludes Administrative Supervision of High Court But Not Judicial Superintendence & Jurisdiction U/A 226: Delhi HC