Classic Textbook Case Of How Not To Draft A Plaint, Which Should Be Taught In Law Colleges: Delhi High Court About Juhi Chawla’s Suit

  • Post category:Daily Judgments
  • Reading time:4 mins read

Classic Textbook Case Of How Not To Draft A Plaint, Which Should Be Taught In Law Colleges: Delhi High Court About Juhi Chawla’s Suit

Case: Juhi Chawla and others v Science and Engineering Research Board and others

Coram: Justice J R Midha

Case No: CS(OS) 262/2021

Court Observation: “This is a classic textbook case of, how not to draft a plaint, which should be taught in law colleges and to young lawyers so that such bloopers in the drafting of pleadings, damaging to one’s own client, are avoided”

“It appears that the plaintiffs have filed this suit to gain publicity which is clear from the fact that plaintiff No.1 circulated the video conferencing link of this Court on her social media accounts, which resulted in the repeated disruption of the Court proceedings.”

“During the course of the hearing of this suit, the Court proceedings were disrupted thrice by the unknown miscreants who continued the disruptions despite repeated warnings. Issue show-cause notice to the persons who disrupted the Court proceedings as to why the proceedings for contempt of Court be not initiated against them. The Delhi Police shall identify the persons and serve the notice on them.”

[doc id=5908]

Previous Posts

‘Defective, Vexatious’: Delhi High Court Dismisses Juhi Chawla’s Civil Suit Against 5G Roll Out With Rs 20 Lakhs Cost

Financial Constraints Or Pandemic Not Grounds For State Agencies To Sack Employees: Delhi High Court In Air India Pilots Case

Mere Delay In Production Of OBC-Non Creamy Layer Certificate Not A Ground To Reject Candidature: Kerala High Court

Trial Courts Have To Clearly Specify Whether Sentences Would Run Concurrently Or Consecutively: Supreme Court Download Judgement

‘Name Is An Intrinsic Element Of Identity’: Supreme Court Issues Guidelines For Recording Corrections & Changes In CBSE Certificates

Contempt Action Can Be Taken Only In Respect Of Established Wilful Disobedience Of Court Order, Reiterates Supreme Court

Citizen Has Right To Criticize Government As Long As He Does Not Incite People To Violence: Supreme Court in Vinod Dua Case