Confession In Police Custody | ‘Magistrate’ U/S 26 Evidence Act Does Not Include Executive Magistrate: J&K&L High Court

Confession In Police Custody | ‘Magistrate’ U/S 26 Evidence Act Does Not Include Executive Magistrate

Case: Rayees Ahmad Dar Vs UT of J&K

Coram: Justice Sanjay Dhar

Case No.: Bail App No.05/2022

Court Observation: “Giving it any other construction would defeat the provisions contained in Section 164 of the Cr. P. C, which provides for safeguards for ensuring recording of confessions of the accused in a free and fair environment.”

“This view is further strengthened from the fact that the provisions contained in Section 164 of the Cr. P. C, which deals with the recording of confessions and statements, clearly provides that it is only a Metropolitan Magistrate or the Judicial Magistrate who is empowered to record the confession or statement made in the course of an investigation or even afterwards before the commencement of the inquiry or trial”

Previous Posts

When A Graver Offence Is Added Against An Accused On Bail, Investigation Agency Has Option To Arrest After Seeking Fresh Order From Court: J&K&L HC

S.142 NI Act | Magistrate Can’t Take Cognizance If Complaint Not Filed Within One Month After Cheque Drawer Received Statutory Notice: Patna HC

Candidates Born In Maharashtra But Completed 10th/ 12th From Outside Due To Parent’s Army Posting Entitled To State Quota In Admissions: High Court

Lodging Juveniles In Adult Prisons Amounts To Deprivation Of Their Personal Liberty: Supreme Court

Orissa High Court Upholds Conviction Of Dara Singh & Other Accused In 1999 Father Arul Doss Murder Case

Vehicle Owners Can’t Be Expected To Make Enquiries With RTOs All Over Country To Cross Check Validity Of Driver’s License: J&K&L High Court

Keywords

Confession In Police Custody,