Delhi High Court Permanently Restrains Pharmaceutical Products Manufacturers From Using LOOZOUT Trademark, Imposes Rs. 2 Lakhs Cost

Case: Intas Pharmaceuticals Private Limited V. Intra Life Private Limited & Ors.

Coram: Justice Jyoti Singh

Case No.: CS(COMM) 243/2022

Court Observation: “Defendants No. 2 and 3 have chosen to stay away from the proceedings, despite service and thus there is no justification or reasonable explanation to adopt the infringing mark on the products manufactured by them,”

“Since the suit has been settled qua Defendant No.1 at an early stage of litigation, Plaintiff is entitled to refund of 50% of the Court Fees deposited by it, in accordance with provisions of Section 16A of the Court Fees Act, 1870 read with Section 89 CPC, 1908,”

Previous Posts

313 CrPC | Trial Court Is Required To Bring ‘Specific Attention’ Of Accused To Incriminating Materials: Meghalaya High Court

S 171 Contract Act – Bank Can’t Retain Title Documents after Repayment of Loan Citing Pendency of another Loan: Bombay High Court

Delinquent’s Right To Receive Enquiry Report Must Be Read Into Every Statute Even If Not Explicitly Stated: Kerala High Court

No Arbitrariness: Delhi High Court Dismisses Pleas By TT Players Swastika Ghosh & Manush Shah Challenging Their Exclusion From CWG 2022

Order For Rateable Distribution Of Property Among Various Decree Holders Bars Them From Setting-Off Their Individual Debt: Kerala High Court

Money Decree/Certificate Of Recovery In Favour Of Financial Creditor Gives Fresh Cause Of Action To Initiate CIRP U/s 7 IBC: Supreme Court Download Judgement

‘Parity Of Punishment’: Gujarat High Court Reduces Deduction Of Pension From 100% To 25% Of Sub-Inspector Accused Of Aiding Escape Of Prisoner

S.306/307 CrPC | Pardon Can Be Tendered To Any Person Privy To The Offence, Not Only The Accused: Kerala High Court

Suit Against A Firm Is A Suit Against All Persons Who Were Its Partners When Cause Of Action Occured: Kerala High Court

Industrial Disputes Act | Workmen Terminated In Violation Of Retrenchment & Re-Employment Procedure U/S 25G & 25H Entitled To Reinstatement: Gujarat HC

Keywords

LOOZOUT Trademark, Pharmaceutical Products

Related Articles

• Delhi High Court Permanently Restrains Retail Store From Selling Any Counterfeit Product Under ‘Hettich’ Trademark & Logo
• ‘Lackadaisical Approach’: Delhi High Court Imposes ₹20K Cost On Centre For Failing To Pay Pension To 96 -Yr-Old Freedom Fighter
• Delhi High Court Restrains Parle From Using ‘For The Bold’ Tagline As Predominant Part Of Advertising ‘B Fizz’ Drink In Suit By PepsiCo