Delhi High Court Permanently Restrains Retail Store From Selling Any Counterfeit Product Under ‘Hettich’ Trademark & Logo

Case: Heetich Marketing-Und Vertriebs Gmbh & Co. Kg., & Anr V. Gupta Store

Coram: Justice Jyoti Singh

Case No.: CS(COMM) 205/2018

Court Observation: “Accordingly, Defendant, its partners or proprietors, its officers, servants, agents and representatives, as the case may be, are permanently restrained from selling any counterfeit product and/or any other related goods under the trademark and trade name HETTICH and HETTICH Logo or any other deceptively similar mark thereof, amounting to infringement of Plaintiffs’ registered trademarks and passing off,”

Previous Posts

313 CrPC | Trial Court Is Required To Bring ‘Specific Attention’ Of Accused To Incriminating Materials: Meghalaya High Court

S 171 Contract Act – Bank Can’t Retain Title Documents after Repayment of Loan Citing Pendency of another Loan: Bombay High Court

Delinquent’s Right To Receive Enquiry Report Must Be Read Into Every Statute Even If Not Explicitly Stated: Kerala High Court

No Arbitrariness: Delhi High Court Dismisses Pleas By TT Players Swastika Ghosh & Manush Shah Challenging Their Exclusion From CWG 2022

Order For Rateable Distribution Of Property Among Various Decree Holders Bars Them From Setting-Off Their Individual Debt: Kerala High Court

Money Decree/Certificate Of Recovery In Favour Of Financial Creditor Gives Fresh Cause Of Action To Initiate CIRP U/s 7 IBC: Supreme Court Download Judgement

‘Parity Of Punishment’: Gujarat High Court Reduces Deduction Of Pension From 100% To 25% Of Sub-Inspector Accused Of Aiding Escape Of Prisoner

S.306/307 CrPC | Pardon Can Be Tendered To Any Person Privy To The Offence, Not Only The Accused: Kerala High Court

Suit Against A Firm Is A Suit Against All Persons Who Were Its Partners When Cause Of Action Occured: Kerala High Court

Industrial Disputes Act | Workmen Terminated In Violation Of Retrenchment & Re-Employment Procedure U/S 25G & 25H Entitled To Reinstatement: Gujarat HC

Related Articles

• Delhi High Court Permanently Restrains Pharmaceutical Products Manufacturers From Using LOOZOUT Trademark, Imposes Rs. 2 Lakhs Cost
• Delhi HC Rules In Favor Of Castrol In Trademark Infringement Suit, Says Compromise In Product Quality Can Adversely Affect Customers
• The Delhi High Court denies interim relief to ‘Khadi’ in a trademark infringement suit, asserting that goodwill acquired after the ‘terminus ad quem’ is inconsequential