Court-Monitored Probe Is A Significant Measure, Can’t Be Employed Routinely: Delhi High Court

Case: Tarun Narang V. State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) And Ors.

Coram: Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula

Case No.: W.P.(C) 1938/2019

Court Observation: We must preserve its weight for situations where the state appears either ignorant or non-cognizant of issues. Resorting to such an investigation without substantial reasoning could inadvertently diminish its efficacy.

That said, we earnestly hope that GNCTD remains steadfast in its mission, taking insights from the CAG Report, identifying the areas of improvement as outlined in its affidavit, and implementing remedial measures

Before parting, we must note that the CAG Report commences its observations by highlighting a marked increase in in-patient admissions and out-patient visits across all three hospitals and dispensaries of the Directorate during the period 2012-2017. Such a trend signifies a growing recognition and trust in the effectiveness of the Indian System of Medicines “The same must be achieved through strategic planning and efficient execution of AYUSH schemes and initiatives”

RERA Authority Can Award Statutory Interest Even If Allottee Withdrawing From Project Claims Lower Rate: Kerala High Court

POCSO Act Bone Ossification Test Vital Only When Victim On Cusp Of Majority, Bombay HC Accepts Victim A Minor Based On Father’s Evidence

Madras High Court Sets Aside Conviction Of Major General For Alleged Corruption In Supplies For Indian Peace Keeping Force At Srilanka In 1987

Madras High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To Students Booked For Violence In School, Asks Them To Make Hand-Written Notes On Non-Violence

Rs.100 Bribe Amount Too Small To Prosecute Accused Under Prevention Of Corruption Act: Bombay High Court

Keywords

Court-Monitored Probe, Delhi High Court