Daily Diary Reports Must Contain Details Of ‘Specific Activities’ That Necessitated Preventive Detention: J&K High Court
Case: Kewal Krishan Vs Financial Commissioner ACS Home Department and ors.
Coram: Justice Rajnesh Oswal
Case No.: WP (Crl) No. 20/2023
Court Observation: “On this ground only, the order of detention is not sustainable in the eyes of law”
“Both these DDRs are vague and bereft of the necessary details in respect of the specific activities of the petitioner, which necessitated the issuance of detention order and as such, these DDRs could not have relied upon by the respondent No. 2 while issuing the order of detention”
“The daily diary reports being vague and bereft of details of the activities of the petitioner which necessitated the issuance of the detention order, could not have been relied upon by the detaining authority i.e. respondent no. 2 while issuing the order of detention”.
Previous Posts
