Delay In Appointment Due To No Fault Of The Candidate Cannot Be Allowed To Result In Delayed Promotion
Case: Bhalodiya Ravikumar Jaynatilal Versus State Of Gujarat
Coram: Justice Biren Vaishnav
Case No.: R/Special Civil Application No. 5192 Of 2019
Court Observation: “Immediately, after offering appointment to the petitioner, the petitioner stepped back accepting the stand of the respondents in not insisting for his Sports Certificate being considered. The respondents reacted and responded in appointing the petitioner only on 08.07.2013 which was a delay purely attributable to the respondents. Pending the petition, the candidates at serial numbers 106 and 107 have been appointed as Multi Purpose Health Supervisors. The petition is allowed, accordingly. The consequential effect of quashing the placement at 184 of the petitioner would entitle the petitioner for being promoted to the post of Multi Purpose Health Supervisor with effect from 08.03.2019 with all consequential benefits including arrears of pay.”
Previous Posts
Gift Deed Not Effective When Possession Not Handed Over; Can Be Cancelled: Madras High Court
Supreme Court Bars Charging Compound Interest Or Penal Interest On Any Borrower During Loan Moratorium; Refuses Moratorium Extension Download Judgement
Keywords
Delay In Appointment, Delayed Promotion
