Difference Between ‘Mortgage By Conditional Sale’ & ‘Sale With Condition Of Retransfer’: Supreme Court Explains

Difference Between ‘Mortgage By Conditional Sale’ & ‘Sale With Condition Of Retransfer’: Supreme Court Explains

Case: Prakash (Dead) By LR. v. G. Aradhya & Ors.

Coram: Justices Hima Kohli and Rajesh Bindal

Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL NO.706 OF 2015

Court Observation: A deeming fiction was added in the negative that a transaction shall not be deemed to be a mortgage unless the condition for reconveyance is contained in the document that purports to effect the sale.

It is the undisputed case in hand that it was not a single document, the conditions contained have to be considered by this Court to opine that the transaction was not a sale, but a mortgage. Admittedly, there are two separate documents.

A bare perusal of the said provision clearly shows that a mortgage by conditional sale must be evidenced by one document whereas a sale with a condition of retransfer may be evidenced by more than one document. A sale with a condition of retransfer is not a mortgage. It is not a partial transfer. By reason of such a transfer, all rights have been transferred reserving only a personal right to the purchaser (sic seller), and such a personal right would be lost unless the same is exercised within the stipulated time.

In terms of the Sale Deed and the Reconveyance Deed, reconsidered in the light of the enunciation of law, the Court opined that the same cannot be held to be a transaction of mortgage of property. The sale of property initially, was absolute. By way of execution of the Reconveyance Deed, namely, on the same day, the only right given to the appellants was to repurchase the property.

Previous Posts

‘Presumption Of Innocence A Human Right; Life & Liberty Are Not Matters To Be Trifled With’: Supreme Court Acquits 1995 Murder Case Accused

Ex-Wife Can File Complaint Under Section 498A IPC Only For Harassment Allegedly Meted Out During Subsistence Of Marriage: Gujarat High Court

Preventive Detention- 3 Months Limit Under Article 22(4)(a) Applies Only At Initial Stage Till Advisory Board’s Report: Supreme Court

Services Provided By EY India To Overseas EY Entities Not “Intermediary Services”: Delhi High Court Directs IGST Refund To EY India

TP Act | Transaction Can’t Be Regarded As ‘Mortgage By Conditional Sale’ If Condition For Reconveyance Is Not Specified In Same Deed: Supreme Court