TP Act | Transaction Can’t Be Regarded As ‘Mortgage By Conditional Sale’ If Condition For Reconveyance Is Not Specified In Same Deed: Supreme Court

Case: Prakash (Dead) By LR. V G. Aradhya & Ors

Coram: Justice Hima Kohli and Justice Rajesh Bindal

Case No.: Civil Appeal No.706 Of 2015

Court Observation: “In terms of the Sale Deed and the Reconveyance Deed, reconsidered in the light of the enunciation of law, as referred to above, in our opinion, the same cannot be held to be a transaction of mortgage of property. Sale of property initially, was absolute. By way of execution of Reconveyance Deed, namely, on the same day, the only right given to the appellants was to repurchase the property.”

Previous Posts

Ex-Wife Can File Complaint Under Section 498A IPC Only For Harassment Allegedly Meted Out During Subsistence Of Marriage: Gujarat High Court

Preventive Detention- 3 Months Limit Under Article 22(4)(a) Applies Only At Initial Stage Till Advisory Board’s Report: Supreme Court

Services Provided By EY India To Overseas EY Entities Not “Intermediary Services”: Delhi High Court Directs IGST Refund To EY India

Orissa High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against 146 Villagers Who Gathered In CDailyhurch Amid COVID Restrictions To Offer Prayers For Departed Soul

Patna High Court Criticizes “Ugly Haste” Of POCSO Court Which Conducted Entire Trial And Sentenced Accused In A Single Day, Orders Fresh Trial

Kerala High Court Dismisses Plea To Suspend State’s Top Officials For ‘Undue Influence’, Says Aimless Allegations Without Supporting Material

Keywords

TP Act, Supreme Court, Mortgage By Conditional Sale

Related Articles

• Difference Between ‘Mortgage By Conditional Sale’ & ‘Sale With Condition Of Retransfer’: Supreme Court Explains
• Non-payment of purchase consideration does not automatically void a sale deed: Supreme Court
• NCLT Kochi: Sale of Corporate Debtor’s Property can’t be termed “fraudulent” merely on an unsupported claim of security interest