Entire Salary Differential Of Higher Post Can’t Be Granted Merely Because Additional Duties Were Undertaken By Workman Of Lower Post
Case: Sharda Chimanbhai Lalbhai VS Dinesh Mohanbhai Prajapati
Coram: Justice Kogje
Case No.: C/SCA/3813/2018
Court Observation: “The requirement of the Recruitment Rules specifies that a Ward-boy only to be literate and there is no specification with regard to selection process whereas… post of Telephone Operator being Class-III, the post had prescribed qualification of SSC pass and experience of Telephone Exchange and such person would be eligible for selection process. This being the most important aspect, the Industrial Tribunal ought not to have granted the pay scale of Class-III post to the respondent, who was admittedly appointed on the post of a Ward-boy.”
Previous Posts
Pendency Of Prosecution No Bar To An Order Of Preventive Detention: J&K&L High Court
Keywords
Entire Salary Differential, Additional Duties, Workman Of Lower Post
Related Articles
- Workman In Continuous Service For Years Without Any Break Can’t Be Denied Benefit U/S 25F ID Act Merely Because Of Contractual Engagement: Gujarat HC
- Increment Earned For Past Period Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Employee Had Retired When It Became Payable: Gujarat High Court
- Merely Because Some Benefit Accrued To Litigant Due To Interim Order, They Cannot Claim Such Benefits When Litigation Ends Against Them: Gujarat HC
