Increment Earned For Past Period Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Employee Had Retired When It Became Payable: Gujarat High Court

Increment Earned For Past Period Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Employee Had Retired When It Became Payable

Case: Jayantibhai Bahecharbhai Patel VS State Of Gujarat

Coram: Justice Biren Vaishnav

Case No.: C/SCA/20181/2021

Court Observation: “The central government servant retiring on 30th June has already completed a year of service and the increment has been earned provided his conduct was good. It would thus be wholly arbitrary if the increment earned by the central government employee on the basis of his good conduct for a year is denied only on the ground that he was not in employment on the succeeding day when increment,”

Previous Posts

Bottles For Sample Collection Not Cleaned On Spot: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal For Alleged Offences Under Food Adulteration Act

Kerala Education Rules | Only State-Authorised Officer Empowered To Extend Higher Secondary School Teachers’ Suspension Beyond 15 Days: High Court

S.19(2) Food Adulteration Act | Vendor Not Liable For Articles Purchased From Manufacturer With Written Warranty: Gujarat High Court

Defamation Cases For Reporting Details Of FIR Nothing But Attempt To Stifle Reporter: Bombay High Court

Conducting Exams For LLB Admissions- University Rules Prevails Over Bar Council Of India Rules: Gujarat High Court

Plea Of Adjustment Should Be Raised Before Institution Of Suit: Kerala High Court Reiterates

It Has Never Been The Effort Of Courts To Make Death Penalty Redundant Or Non Existent: Supreme Court

Second Appeal: Judgment Should Not Be Interfered With By High Court Unless There Is A Substantial Question Of Law, Reiterates Supreme Court Download Judgement

School Girl Injured After Conductor Signals Driver To Move While She Was Boarding The Bus: Kerala High Court Upholds Conviction U/S 308 IPC

Rent Controller Cannot Call Upon Landlord To Carry Out Repairs Of Tenanted Premises Under Delhi Rent Control Act: High Court

Delhi High Court Permanently Restrains Pharmaceutical Products Manufacturers From Using LOOZOUT Trademark, Imposes Rs. 2 Lakhs Cost