Family Court Can Restore Application U/S 125 CrPC After Its Dismissal For Default

Case: Sachindra Kumar Samal v. Madhusmita Samal @ Swain & Anr.

Coram: Justice Radha Krishna Pattanaik

Case No.: CRLMC No. 1943 of 2022

Court Observation: “When a proceeding of maintenance is dismissed on account of default and if it is claimed that the court lacks jurisdiction to restore it in absence of any provision, how it could have been dismissed for non-prosecution, again for having no provision in the Cr.P.C. According to the Court since such is action is predominantly civil in nature, the power to restore a proceeding under Section 125 Cr. P.C. is inherent.”

Previous Posts

Income Tax Act does not impose any limitation for filing an application for condonation of delay: Kerala High Court

Child Born From Second Wife Of A Deceased Employee Eligible For Compassionate Appointment: Rajasthan High Court

‘Discretion’ Has No Place In Contractual Matters Unless It Is Expressely Incorporated In Contract: Supreme Court

S.134 Evidence Act | Testimony Of Single Eyewitness Can Form Basis For Conviction Provided It Is Of Sterling Quality: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Doctrine Of Group Of Companies, Can’t Implead Third Party To Arbitration: Delhi High Court

Addition/Disallowance Can’t Be Made Merely On Assessee’s Admission During Search: Delhi High Court

Mere Registration Of FIRs Can’t Have Nexus With Breach Of Maintenance Of ‘Public Order’: Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention

Detaining Authority Must Be Aware That Detenu Is Already In Custody & Must Show Compelling Reasons To Pass Preventive Detention Order: Kerala HC

Keywords

Family Court Can Restore Application, S 125 CrPC, Dismissal For Default