How to respond to a legal notice in India: timelines, format, cost, and when to file a caveat

  • Post category:Blog
  • Reading time:9 mins read

How to respond to a legal notice in India: timelines, format, cost, and when to file a caveat

Written by Akarsh Sharma

Table of Contents

Here is a step-by-step, SEO-friendly guide on how to respond to a legal notice in India, covering timelines, reply format, costs, and when to file a caveat—with practical templates and checklists founders, professionals, and individuals can use immediately.

A legal notice is a formal demand or intimation sent before initiating legal proceedings, giving the recipient a chance to cure a breach, settle a claim, or state their defense on record. While replying is not legally mandatory in every case, ignoring a notice often weakens the defense and can prompt swift litigation, whereas a precise reply can de-escalate or settle early.

Timelines: how long to reply, and special regimes

There is no single statutory timeline for all notices; the period is typically stated in the notice (often 7–30 days) and may be influenced by the subject-matter statute or forum. As a rule of thumb, aim to acknowledge within 3–7 days and reply substantively within the demand window.

  • Typical demand windows: 15–30 days are common across money recovery, contract, employment, tenancy, and IP notices; reply within the stated time or seek an extension in writing.
  • Consumer disputes: once a complaint is filed and notice is served with the complaint, the opposite party has 30 days to file its version with a one-time 15-day extension; beyond 45 days, forums are bound to close the right to file. Plan defense timelines backwards from notice service.
  • Government notices: some laws (e.g., Section 80 CPC for suits against Government) require prior notice by the claimant; while this affects the sender, recipients should still reply promptly to mitigate disputes.
  • Caveat window awareness: if a caveat is filed anticipating an ex parte application, it remains valid for 90 days; use this to ensure hearing notice in that period.

Practical tip: if more time is required to collect documents or attempt settlement, write within the notice period acknowledging receipt and asking for an extension of 7–14 days; many claimants agree if negotiations are genuine.

  • Verify sender identity and authority (individual vs. company, advocate’s details) and the address used for service.
  • Identify the cause of action (contract breach, money recovery, defamation, IP infringement, tenancy, employment) and any statutory hooks that may tighten timelines.
  • Collect all documents: contracts, PO/Invoices, emails, WhatsApp, payment proofs, photographs, call recordings, and prior notices; create a chronology.
  • Check limitation: note when the alleged breach occurred; do not concede facts that revive stale claims.
  • Decide the strategy: full denial, partial admission with settlement offer, or cure and close; align business objectives with legal posture.

Reply format: structure, tone, and must-include points

A reply should be clear, factual, and non-inflammatory; it should avoid unnecessary admissions while addressing each allegation. Use letterhead or advocate’s letterhead, and send by RPAD/courier/email as per the notice mode; keep proof of dispatch.

Essential structure:

  • Header: date, sender and addressee details, subject line referencing “Reply to Legal Notice dated [date] re [matter]”.
  • Preliminary reservations: “without prejudice” (for settlement communications), denial of jurisdiction if applicable, and a non-admission clause.
  • Point-wise response: admit/deny facts; correct inaccuracies; attach evidence references; reserve rights for detailed pleadings if litigation ensues.
  • Legal grounds: cite contract clauses, payment terms, limitation, statutory defenses, or lack of privity/consideration as relevant.
  • Demand/counter-proposal: propose cure, payment schedule, replacement, apology, or withdrawal of defamatory statements; or counter-claim notice for damages.
  • Closing and mode: request acknowledgement; specify preferred communication channel; sign and stamp.

Copy-paste reply template:
From: [Name/Entity, Address, Email, Phone]
Date: [dd/mm/yyyy]
To: [Advocate/Sender Name, Address]
Subject: Reply to Legal Notice dated [dd/mm/yyyy] regarding [reference]

  1. Receipt: The Notice is acknowledged without admission.
  2. Facts: The averments are denied save as specifically admitted. Briefly: [chronology and facts].
  3. Contracts/Payments: As per [Contract/PO/Invoice], obligations were fulfilled/are contingent upon [conditions]; payment of ₹[amount] was made on [date] (UTR [ref]).
  4. Specific replies: Para 1: denied/clarified; Para 2: admitted in part; [continue point-wise].
  5. Legal position: The claims are barred by limitation/lack consideration/privity; no breach is made out under Clause [x].
  6. Without prejudice: In the interest of settlement, we offer [payment plan/replacement/apology/meeting].
  7. Intimation: Any proceedings initiated shall be defended at cost and risk; counter-claims are reserved.

Sincerely,
[Signature, Name, Designation]

Important drafting guards:

  • Use “without prejudice” only if making settlement offers; otherwise, state that rights and contentions are reserved.
  • Avoid defamatory counter-allegations; confine to facts and legal defenses.
  • Attach copies, not originals; paginate annexures; reference them in the body (Annexure A, B…).

Costs: lawyer fees, dispatch, and hidden expenses

  • Advocate drafting and vetting: varies by city and complexity; typical bands for standard notices and replies are ₹3,000–₹25,000 for small disputes; complex corporate/IP/defamation matters can run ₹25,000–₹75,000+.
  • Courier/postage: RPAD and professional courier charges typically ₹100–₹500 per packet; keep receipts and tracking.
  • Notarisation/affidavit: generally not required for a reply, but may be used for annexures or authorisation; minor additional cost.
  • Follow-on: if settlement is reached, stamping/registration of settlement or MoU may add government fees; if litigation follows, court fees and vakalatnama costs apply.

Cost-saving tips:

  • Provide a clean chronology and scanned documents to counsel to reduce drafting time.
  • Use email plus RPAD for service proof; avoid multiple courier attempts unless necessary.

When to file a caveat under Section 148A CPC

A caveat is a pre-emptive “watch” filed when there is a reasonable apprehension that a case (with interim application) may be filed against the caveator; it compels the court to hear the caveator before granting ex parte relief, and it remains valid for 90 days from filing.

File a caveat when:

  • The other side has threatened suit or issued a notice indicating imminent injunction application (IP, property, partnership, employment restraint).
  • You anticipate ex parte orders (e.g., eviction, restraining orders, bank account freeze, trademark injunction) and want to ensure hearing.
  • A prior round of litigation exists and an appeal or fresh interim application is expected.

Key features and process:

  • Who can file: any person with a right to appear upon hearing of an application in a suit instituted or about to be instituted.
  • Duration: valid for 90 days; refile to extend coverage.
  • Service: the caveator must serve notice of filing the caveat by RPAD to the expected applicant; the court then notifies the caveator on any application.
  • Consequences of breach: if the court grants orders without serving the caveator despite a live caveat, the order can be stayed or costs imposed.

Caveat vs. legal notice:

  • A caveat protects against ex parte interim orders; a legal notice seeks compliance or settlement and is often a pre-suit demand by the claimant. They are different tools used by opposite sides of a dispute.

Special scenarios and reply nuances

  • Cheque bounce: a statutory demand under NI Act usually precedes complaint; adhere strictly to the 15-day payment window from receipt; reply with payment proof or defenses (no legally enforceable debt, defective notice).
  • Employment: reply carefully to allegations of misconduct/confidentiality breach; propose internal inquiry rather than public escalation.
  • Defamation: respond firmly; deny false imputations; demand withdrawal/apology; reserve right to sue; avoid republication of defamatory content in reply.
  • IP infringement: consider undertaking to cease disputed use without admission while negotiating coexistence or license; caveat if you expect an injunction motion.

Service and proof: how to send your reply

  • Modes: RPAD (Registered Post A/D), speed post, reputable courier, and email to the advocate/sender indicated in the legal notice.
  • Proof: preserve tracking, delivery status, and email delivery logs; file away a signed PDF and dispatch cover.
  • Authority: for companies, send on letterhead signed by an authorised signatory with board/POA as applicable.

Settlement and without prejudice communications

  • Use “without prejudice” headers when making settlement offers; such communications are generally protected from being used as admissions, but do not label everything indiscriminately.
  • Draft settlement MoUs with clear payment schedules, defaults, and withdrawal/closure terms; ensure stamping/registration where required.

Practical checklists

Intake checklist (Day 0–3):

  • Acknowledge receipt to sender/advocate; request missing documents; diarise deadline; lock a counsel if needed.
  • Gather contracts, communications, payment proof; prepare chronology and issues list.

Drafting checklist (Day 3–10):

  • Choose tone (defensive/conciliatory); insert preliminary reservations; respond para-wise; attach evidence; propose resolution if desirable.
  • Legal issues: limitation, jurisdiction, arbitrability, notice defects; include counter-claim warning if appropriate.

Dispatch checklist (Before deadline):

  • Print, sign, paginate; send via RPAD/courier and email; save proofs; calendar follow-up.

Caveat checklist:

  • Identify the likely court and cause-title; prepare caveat petition with address for service; annex prior notice if any; file and obtain caveat number; serve caveat by RPAD on the counterparty.

FAQs

  • Is replying mandatory? Not in all cases, but highly advisable to control the narrative and avoid adverse inferences.
  • Can I reply without a lawyer? Yes, but professional drafting is recommended for complex or high-value disputes; templates help for simpler matters.
  • What if the deadline is impossible? Seek an extension in writing; if refused, still send a partial reply reserving rights and follow up with a detailed one.
  • What if I plan to sue first? Respond briefly denying claims and state that detailed response will follow in court; consider filing a caveat if expecting an injunction application.

Editable templates

Subject line options:

  • “Reply to Legal Notice dated [dd/mm/yyyy]—Contract No. [x]”
  • “Without Prejudice: Settlement Proposal re Notice dated [dd/mm/yyyy]”

Caveat cover note (to serve on expected applicant):

  • “Take notice that the undersigned has filed Caveat No. [x] on [date] before the [Court], in anticipation of any application in the matter of [dispute]. You are requested to serve us with any application in the said matter to enable appearance and submissions.”

Acknowledgement and extension ask:

  • “We acknowledge your Notice dated [date]. We are collating documents and propose to send a comprehensive reply by [date + 10 days]. Kindly confirm no precipitative steps will be taken in the interim.”

By following these steps—acknowledging promptly, investigating facts, replying in the right format

and tone, budgeting for modest costs, and filing a caveat when ex parte action is likely—recipients can turn a legal notice from a threat into an opportunity to resolve disputes on their terms.

Tags: , , , ,