Industrial Dispute Act: Person Working in the Capacity of Consultant Cannot Be Deemed Workman: Guj HC Quashes Reinstatement Order

Case: Santram Spinners Limited VS Babubhai Magandas Patel

Coram: Justice Sandeep Bhatt

Case No.: C/SCA/10741/2008

Court Observation: “It is pertinent to note that the learned Labour Court has committed gross error in holding that those documents are complicated and therefore, the learned Labour Court has also erred in giving findings that since TDS is deducted by the petitioner company and therefore, the respondent is workman, who is serving in the petitioner institute and in my opinion, this findings of the learned Labour Court is highly erroneous and against the settled proposition of law.”

Previous Posts

Weapon’s Recovery From Hiding Place Which Is In Exclusive Knowledge Of Accused Makes Such Recovery Absolutely Reliable: Allahabad HC

Industrial Tribunal’s Order Can’t Be Challenged On Disputed Questions Of Facts Under Article 226: J&K&L High Court

Tax Exemptions Given With Benevolent Object, Approach For ‘Exempting’ & ‘Including’ Subject Matters Under Tax Purview Can’t Be Same: Orissa HC

Writ Petition Against Private University Not Maintainable, Remedy For Alleged Arbitrary Termination Lies Under Civil Law: Gujarat High Court

Kerala Municipality Act: No Property Tax Exemption U/S 235 For Building Given On Rent Merely Because Rent Is Utilised For Charity: High Court

License To Use Software Is “Deemed Sale”; Service Tax Not Leviable On Ground That Updates Are Provided: Supreme Court In QuickHeal’s Case

Citizenship Exclusive Domain Of Centre, Civil Court Has No Jurisdiction To Decide Question Of Renunciation: Gujarat High Court

Keywords

Industrial Dispute Act, Capacity of Consultant, Deemed Workman