Law Of Limitation Only Bars Judicial Remedy, The Substantive Right Survives: Kerala High Court
Case: The Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India vs. S. Saradamani & Ors
Coram: Justices Alexander Thomas and K. Babu
Case No: OP (CAT) No.110 of 2020
Court Observation: “We make it clear that the substantive right of the petitioners/Bank to recover the money paid in excess to the original applicant in ways other than judicial remedy is not destroyed by reason of the rules of limitation.”
[doc id=6694]
Previous Judgment
Power Of Compounding Must Be Expressly Conferred By Statute Which Creates Offence: Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs States/UTs To Strictly Implement Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act 1979
Wife Staying Abroad For Career Not ‘Cruelty’ To Husband Or ‘Desertion Of Spouse’: Bombay High Court
It Is Necessary To Remind States To Eradicate Child Marriage Menace: Punjab & Haryana High Court
S. 50 Of NDPS Act- Presence Of Magistrate During Search Of Contraband Articles Not Mandatory If Accused Waives His Right: Delhi High Court Download Judgement
Keywords
Law Of Limitation, Bars Judicial Remedy, Substantive Right Survives