Courts Should Allow Parties To Let In Oral And Documentary Evidence In Guardianship Matters

Case: A. Shaamsudeen Raja v Raneesha P.V.

Coram: Justice M.Duraiswamy and Justice Sunder Mohan

Case No: O.S.A.No.152 of 2022

Court Observation: “It is settled law that while deciding the Original Petition to appoint the guardian the courts should allow the party to let in oral and documentary evidences. In such view of the matter, on that ground alone, the order passed by the learned Single Judge in O.P.No.423 of2020 is liable to be set aside.”

Previous Posts

S.33C Industrial Disputes Act Is For Execution Of Award, Labour Court Can’t Enter Adjudicatory Process To Decide Disputed Facts: Gujarat High Court

Dispute Arising Out Of Agreements Relating To Property Used Exclusively In ‘Trade & Commerce’ Constitutes “Commercial Dispute”: Gujarat High Court

Bombay High Court Warns Principal Chief Commissioners Of Customs For Non-Representation In Cases

Only A Food Inspector Can Investigate A Commission Of Offence Related To Food Items As Per The FSS Act: Gauhati High Court

Intention Of Parties A Key Factor To Ascertain Benami Transactions: Kerala High Court

Delay In Appointment Due To No Fault Of The Candidate Cannot Be Allowed To Result In Delayed Promotion: Gujarat High Court

Claim For Regularization Of Suspension Period Can’t Be Examined In Isolation Pending Challenge To Dismissal From Service: Gujarat High Court

Gift Deed Not Effective When Possession Not Handed Over; Can Be Cancelled: Madras High Court

‘Human Tendency To Wait For Missing Person’: Gujarat High Court Says Suit For Declaring Child Missing Since 1984 Dead Not Barred By Limitation

Undertrial Also Barred From Voting As Per Section 62(5) RP Act; Allowing Prisoners To Vote Doesn’t Strengthen Democracy: Bombay High Court

Supreme Court Bars Charging Compound Interest Or Penal Interest On Any Borrower During Loan Moratorium; Refuses Moratorium Extension Download Judgement

Previous Posts

Oral And Documentary Evidence, Guardianship Matters