PC Act | Proceedings By Third Parties Not Judicial Proceedings, Employer Cannot Withhold Pension On Such Grounds: Karnataka High Court

PC Act | Proceedings By Third Parties Not Judicial Proceedings, Employer Cannot Withhold Pension On Such Grounds: Karnataka High Court

Case: Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited & Other And Mallikarjun Savanur

Coram: Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav and Justice Vijaykumar A Patil

Case No.: Writ Appeal No. 100422 of 2023.

Court observation: “The judicial proceedings instituted by third parties under the PC Act cannot be considered to be proceedings instituted under Regulation 171. Proceedings instituted by third parties cannot be construed to fall within the category of judicial proceedings permitting the employer to withhold the pension of the employee.”

“any pecuniary loss caused to the Board”, are required to be construed as a condition precedent even as regards enquiry sought to be initiated after attaining superannuation in terms of Regulation 172(b). Such interpretation would be necessary taking note of the nature of the pension being a reward for the past services rendered and if sought to be withheld, the same must be sanctioned by the applicable regulation.”

Previous Posts

‘Scheduled Offence’ Cannot Exist After Quashing Of FIR: Delhi High Court Quashes PMLA Proceedings

Private Car Act Policy | Gauhati High Court Sets Aside MACT Order Directing Insurance Company To Pay Compensation For Death Of Car Occupant

‘Seema Suraksha Bal’ A Central Force With Pan India Presence, Its Orders Subject To Challenge Across All High Courts: J&K High Court

Debt Recovery | Extension Of Interim Relief At The Time Of Remand Subject To Prima Facie Finding In Petitioner’s Favor: Delhi High Court

Section 245C(5) Of Income Tax Act Is Read Down By Removing Retrospective Last Date Of 1st Feb 21 As 31st March 21: Madras High Court