Computation Of Period Of Detention For Default Bail U/S 167 CrPC Is To Be Done Afresh If Additional Offence Found Against Accused: Rajasthan HC

Computation Of Period Of Detention For Default Bail U/S 167 CrPC Is To Be Done Afresh If Additional Offence Found Against Accused

Case: Akheraj v. State of Rajasthan

Coram: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Case No.: S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 233/2022

Court Observation: This Court hereby observes that the right to seek default/statutory bail accrues to the accused in the nature of an indefeasible right, only if such remedy by preferring an appropriate application has been availed of within the prescribed window from the date of expiry of total period of detention of accused person(s) under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., until filing of the charge-sheet.”

“A bare perusal of Section 167 (2) Cr.P.C. reveals that under sub-section (2) (a) (I) of 167 Cr.P.C., the period of 90 days would be computed when the investigation, with regard to that particular offence(s), began. The offence under Section 363 I.P.C. would attract the application of Section 167 sub-section (2) (a) (ii) of Cr.P.C. since the maximum / upper limit period of imprisonment under the said section would be 60 days. Regardless of that fact, this Court finds that if an additional or new offence(s) are found to be made out by the investigating authority, against an accused, then the computation of the period, as laid down under Section 167 Cr.P.C. would be done afresh.”

Previous Posts

Ad Hoc Payment Made as per Interim Orders Does Not Form Part of Wages under Payment of Wages Act: Supreme Court

Consumer Courts Can Direct Builders to Give Refund & Compensation to Homebuyers for Failure to Deliver Apartments: Supreme Court

Leave to Defend U/Sec 25B Delhi Rent Control Act Cannot Be Granted to Tenant on Mere Asking: Supreme Court

Breach Of Contract U/S 74 Not Applicable At Pre-Formation Stage: Delhi High Court Directs State to Refund ₹20 Crore Forfeited Amount

Kerala High Court Asks State to Revisit the Procedure for Search & Seizure in Abkari Cases

Defense On Merits Is Not To Be Considered At Stage Of Framing Of Charge And/Or At The Stage Of Discharge Application Download Judgement

Unilateral Refusal to Consummate Marriage Is a Ground for Divorce; Amounts To Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Reiterates

Period of Suspension of Govt Servant Not To Be Treated As On Duty Where Acquittal Based On Benefit of Doubt: Bombay High Court

Order XI CPC | Application for Leave to Serve Interrogatories Need Not Be Decided Ex-Parte, Court Can Issue Notice On Opposite Party: Delhi High Court