No Interference U/A 227 Unless Lower Court Committed Manifest Error Or Decision Is Against Settled Principles Of Law

Case: K.V Shiraz v. Binny Emmatty

Coram: Justice Anil K Narendran and Justice P.G Ajithkumar

Case No.: O.P.(RC)NO.72 OF 2022

Court Observation: “No interference under Article 227 of the Constitution is called for unless this Court finds that the lower court or tribunal has committed a manifest error, or the reasoning is palpably perverse or patently unreasonable, or the decision of the lower court or tribunal is in direct conflict with settled principles of law.”

Previous Posts

High Court Has Absolute & Exclusive Disciplinary Control Over District Judiciary Under Article 235: J&K&L High Court

Writ Plea Alleging Violation Of Rights Conferred Under Industrial Settlement Maintainable U/Art 226 Only If Traceable To Common Law: Kerala High Court

Witness Saw Accused Near Deceased, Blood Stained Weapon Recovered: Gujarat High Court Accepts Circumstantial Evidence To Affirm Murder Conviction

Ad Hoc Appointments Can Be Made On Rotational Basis, Seniority Not A Criteria: Karnataka High Court

Beedi Rollers Are Workmen & Entitled To Compensation Under Workmen’s Compensation Act: Telangana High Court

Non-Filing Of Application U/S 8 Arbitration Act Before Civil Court Does Not Debar Party From Seeking Appointment Of Arbitrator: J&K&L High Court

‘Very Serious Allegations’: Kerala High Court Dismisses Plea Alleging Corruption In Judges To Secure Govt. Posts After Retirement

Can’t Refer Dispute To Arbitration Unless There Is A Clear, Unequivocal Denial Of A Right: Kerala High Court

States Have No Power To Identify Socially & Educationally Backward Classes After 102nd Constitution Amendment: Supreme Court Holds By 3:2 Majority Download Judgement