Clean Service Record of Employee Can Be A Significant Factor In Promotion For A Selection Post: Supreme Court

  • Post category:Daily Judgments
  • Reading time:4 mins read

Clean Service Record of Employee Can Be A Significant Factor In Promotion For A Selection Post

Case: Rama Negi vs Union of India

Coram: Justices KM Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy

Case No.: CA 1713-1714 OF 2022

Court Observation: “A marred service record, though not an insurmountable bar, must carry some consequences, and it could be a comparative disadvantage in promotion for a selection post. The employer’s preference for a person with a clean service record can be well appreciated”

“While rejecting the appellant’s seniority claim in the feeder cadre by virtue of her higher salary vis-àvis the respondent no.3, the Division Bench, unfortunately, referred to the incorrect O.M. (dated 10.9.1985), overlooking the applicable O.M. (dated 12.12.1988) of the Ministry of Personnel. In this O.M., as noted earlier, it was clearly stated that the persons in the feeder cadre drawing higher scale will rank senior to those drawing lesser pay scale.”

All these circumstances in our opinion, weigh in favour of the appellant Rama Negi. Her Suitability for the selection post was attributable to two factors i.e. merit of the candidate and the inter-se seniority. Despite the difficulty in encapsulating the parameters for ‘merit’, a significant marker can be found in the unblemished record of the employee. A marred service record, though not an insurmountable bar, must carry some consequences, and it could be a comparative disadvantage in promotion for a selection post. The employer’s preference for a person with a clean service record can be well appreciate

Previous Posts

Highest Bidder Has No Vested Right To Have The Public Auction Concluded In His Favour: Supreme Court

Section 173 CrPC – Magistrate Should Consider Initial Report & Supplementary Report Conjointly to Decide Whether to Proceed Against Accused: Supreme Court

Article 226 – Writ Of Mandamus Virtually Granting Specific Performance Of Contract/Work Order Cannot Be Issued: Supreme Court

PIL Litigation Alleviated Conditions Of Citizens; But Thousands Of Frivolous PILs being Filed: Supreme Court

Section 34 IPC Not Attracted When Final Outcome or Offence Committed is Distinctly Remote and Unconnected with Common Intention: Supreme Court

Should Disobedience Of Injunction Be ‘Wilful’ To Invoke Order 39 Rule 2A CPC? Supreme Court Doubts Its Earlier Judgment