Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence
Case: Sri Abhyudaya Kumar Shahi V. Bharat Pradhan Filling Centre
Coram: Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath
Case No.: Civil Appeal No.1849 Of 2022
Court Observation: “In view of the subsequent events above-mentioned, it is but clear that the present respondent has given up its insistence for decision of the appeal by way of erstwhile mechanism, and rightly so because, even if the respondent (writ petitioner) had the right of consideration of appeal, it had no corresponding right to insist for consideration of the appeal by a forum that was no longer in existence.”
Previous Posts
Article 227 – High Court cannot go deep into Factual Issues like an Appellate Body: Supreme Court
Mere Filing Of Representation Before Authorities Does Not Extend Limitation Period: Supreme Court
Highest Bidder Has No Vested Right To Have The Public Auction Concluded In His Favour: Supreme Court
Cannot Find Favour When Free Speech Is Celebrated – Kerala High Court Quashes Censure against KSEB Cashier For WhatsApp Text Against CM Download Judgement
Keywords
Right of Appeal, Supreme Court
