Madras HC Illustrates Parameters To Determine What Is ‘Urgent Interim Relief’ To Avoid Pre-Institution Mediation U/S 12A Commercial Courts Act

Case: Mr.K Varathan v Mr. Prakash Babu Nakundhi Reddy

Coram: Justice M Sundar

Case No.: C.S. (Comm.Div.) No. 202 of 2022

Court Observation: The thinking process should be profound and thoughtful, such thinking process should lead the plaintiff to believe that prompt action (not attributable to plaintiff’s own doing) is demanded or the matter requires immediate attention and needs to be dealt with immediately and that it is so immediate that time consumed in exhausting the remedy of pre institution mediation that will lead to wrong or injury which the plaintiff in law and equity should not be made to stand and suffer.

Previous Posts

Gujarat Govt’s Policy Giving Preference To Domiciled Residents In Cadaveric Organ Transplant Unconstitutional: High Court

Delhi High Court Rejects Future Group’s Plea Seeking Termination of Arbitration Proceedings With Amazon Before SIAC

Adopted Child Entitled To Seek Compassionate Appointment: Karnataka High Court

Govt Should Not Allow Workers To Remain As Temporary Employees For An Unreasonably Long Time: J&K&L High Court

Vogue Readers Know It Doesn’t Run Any Institute, Confusion Unlikely: Karnataka High Court, Allows Vogue Institute Of Management To Retain Name

‘Neurostimulator Neither Treatment Nor Cure’: Kerala High Court Declares Teenager With 40% Disability Eligible For PwD Quota In KEAM Courses

Challenge Under Section 17 Of The SARFAESI Act Against Action Taken By Secured Creditor, Would Not Bar Arbitration Proceedings: Delhi High Court

Keywords

Urgent Interim Relief,