S.18 Drugs & Cosmetics Act: Jurisdiction To Try Offence Of Manufacturing Sub-Standard Drug Lies Where Sale Is Completed
Case: The State of Andhra Pradesh v. Sri Agpa Pharmaceuticals
Coram: Justice K. Surender
Case No.: Criminal Appeal No.1467 Of 2009
Court Observation: “Section 177 of the Cr.PC lays down that every offence shall ordinarily be inquired into and tried by a court within whose local jurisdiction it was committed. This section is based on the general principle of law that all crime is local. Since the medicine was not manufactured by the accused petitioners within the limits of the local jurisdiction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bikaner, it could not be tried by him as against the accused-petitioners.”
Previous Posts
Clause Every Effort To Arbitrate; Must Be Referred To Arbitration: Calcutta High Court
Keywords
S.18 Drugs & Cosmetics Act, Manufacturing Sub-Standard Drug, Sale Is Completed, Telangana High Court, Offence
Related Articles
- Drugs & Cosmetics Act: Complainant Must Prove “Exclusive Possession” Of Premises By Accused From Where Recovery Is Made: Telangana High Court
- Telangana High Court Holds Telangana Value Added Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 2017 To Be Unconstitutional
- S.354 IPC Not Attracted If Woman Herself Didn’t Perceive The Act Of ‘Catching Hold Of Her Hand’ As Invading Her Decency: Telangana High Court

