Clause Every Effort To Arbitrate; Must Be Referred To Arbitration: Calcutta High Court

Post published: August 2, 2022
Post category:Calcutta High Court / Daily Judgments
Reading time:2 mins read

Clause Every Effort To Arbitrate; Must Be Referred To Arbitration

Case: Manika Sett versus Sett Iron Foundry and Ors.

Coram: Justice Shekhar B. Saraf

Case No.: A.P No. 80 of 2020

Court Observation: “such a partner shall be free to seek interference of the Court for remedy although every effort should be made by the partners to settle the dispute by arbitration.”

“I am of the view that the term “every effort” in the said clause of the partnership deed can be equated with the term “best effort”, in fact, the term “every effort” is much wider in nature in comparison to the phrase “best effort”, and therefore, expands the scope and ambit of the arbitration clause. Connected and incidental matters, unless the arbitration clause suggests to the contrary, would normally be covered.”

Manika-Sett-versus-Sett-Iron-Foundry-and-Ors.-2-August-1 Download

Previous Posts

No Recovery Can Be Made From Pension If Employee’s Promotion Was Not Based On Any Misrepresentation: J&K&L High Court

Sec 24(1) RFCTLARR Act- Land Acquisition Proceedings Get “Initiated” From Publication Of Sec 4(1) Notification Under 1894 Act: Supreme Court

Provisions Of Limitation Act Has No Application When A Statute Extinguishes The Right Itself: Supreme Court

Section 482 CrPC – High Court Can Recall Judgment/Order Which Was Passed Without Hearing A Person Prejudically Affected By It: Supreme Court

S.81(5) Motor Vehicle Act: Permit Renewed After Condoning Delay Is Deemed To Be Effective From Date Of Actual Expiry: Karnataka High Court

‘Matter Of Life & Death’: Delhi High Court Dismisses Challenge To Minimum Percentile Criteria For NEET-PG Admissions

Workman In Continuous Service For Years Without Any Break Can’t Be Denied Benefit U/S 25F ID Act Merely Because Of Contractual Engagement: Gujarat HC

Right To Property May No More Be A Fundamental Right, But Its Sanctity As Human Right Is Still Intact: J&K&L High Court

‘Wish/Desire Of Child’ Is Different From ‘Best Interest Of Child’: Supreme Court Allows A Father’s Plea Seeking Child Custody