Service Law | Supreme Court Upholds Ante Dating Of Seniority List; Says No Prejudice Caused As Separate Quotas Prescribed For Degree & Diploma Holders

Case: C. ANIL CHANDRAN V. M.K. RAGHAVAN AND OTHERS

Coram: Justice Rajesh Bindal and Justice Hima Kohli

Case No.: CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8915 of 2012

Court Observation: “…we do not find that any case has been made out for interference in the present appeal for the reason that the appellant has not been able to demonstrate that for the purpose of promotion from the post of Assistant Engineer to that of Assistant Executive Engineer, he was likely to be affected by antedating the date of promotion of the private respondents as separate quotas had been prescribed for promotion to the next higher post for the categories of Graduate Engineers and Diploma Holders”

Previous Posts

Liberal Approach Be Taken Regarding Delay In Appeals Filed By State: Supreme Court

Cheque Dishonour Cases – What Should Courts Ask Accused Once Presumption Under S.139 NI Act Is Applicable? Supreme Court Explains

What Does `Vacant Land’ Under Section 2 Of Urban Land Ceiling Act Mean? Supreme Court Refers To Larger Bench

CBI’s Enquiry Report Exempted From Disclosure Under RTI Act, Will Impede Ongoing Investigation Process: Delhi High Court

Land Acquisition | Bombay High Court Directs Over Rs. 1.6 Crore Interest to Landowner As Compensation Not Deposited Before Taking Possession

Keywords

Service Law, Ante Dating Of Seniority List