IBPS Can’t Refuse To Recommend Names Of Eligible Candidates With Desired Merit To Fill All Notified Vacancies In Banks

Case: Rahul Jain & Ors. v. Baroda Rajasthan Kshetriya Gramin Bank & Ors.

Coram: Justice Sandeep Mehta and Justice Kuldeep Mathur

Case No.: D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 100/2022

Court Observation: The Recruiting Agency cannot deny allotment of eligible candidates to participating RRBs (Regional Rural Banks) arbitrarily especially when sufficient number of candidates are available with it. The whole exercise cannot be reduced to a farce.

“In the light of above discussion, the special appeal is allowed. IBPS is directed to allot 126 candidates against the post of Officer Scale-II (GBO) to BRKGB in order of merit and preference. The seats falling vacant thereof due to aforesaid exercise in participating RRBs, shall be filled in by recommending suitable candidates to RRBs in order of merit and preference. The entire exercise indicated above shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of this order.”

Previous Posts

Prosecutrix Travelling & Enjoying Hospitality Of Accused After Alleging Rape Belies The Allegations: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail

Statutory Power Of Authority Not Diluted Merely By Mention Of Wrong Provision While Exercising Such Power: Gujarat High Court

‘Let Down All Education’: Madras HC Upholds Doctor’s Suspension For Creating Fake Medical Certificate For Land Grabbing

Arbitral Tribunal Not Barred Under Section 79 Of The RERA Act From Passing An Order Of Injunction: Bombay High Court

Promotion Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Criminal Proceedings Are Pending Against The Employee: J&K&L High Court

Insurance Ombudsman Performs Quasi-Judicial Functions While Deciding Complaints; Award Can Be Challenged Under Article 227: Bombay High Court

Keywords

Vacancies In Banks, Eligible Candidates

Related Articles

• Child Born From Second Wife Of A Deceased Employee Eligible For Compassionate Appointment: Rajasthan High Court
• Rajasthan Stamp Act: Duty Can’t Be Levied On Transaction Not Having ‘Territorial Nexus’ With State: High Court
• Court Can’t Interfere With Administration’s Decision Refusing Firearms License Except In Extraordinary Circumstances: Rajasthan High Court