[Debt Recovery] Service Of Summons Mandatory, Not Dispensed With Party Entering Appearance By Filing Vakalatnama: Bombay High Court

[Debt Recovery] Service Of Summons Mandatory, Not Dispensed With Party Entering Appearance By Filing Vakalatnama

Case: Sunil Gupta and Ors. v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. and Ors.

Coram: Justices K. R. Shriram and A. S. Doctor

Case No.: Writ Petition No. 4885 of 2022

Court Observation: “Service of summons is a mandatory procedural requirement and is not dispensed with merely on account of the party entering appearance by filing a Vakalatnama”

“Respondent no.1/IOB has not produced any evidence/document to establish that summons was in fact created and served on petitioners in accordance with the aforesaid Act, DRT Rules and the aforesaid DRT Regulations or that any of the steps set out hereinabove were complied with”

Sunil-Gupta-and-Ors.-v.-Asset-Reconstruction-Company-India-Ltd.-and-Ors.-17-Septemebr-5Download

Previous Posts

Approval Granted By Pune Municipal Corporation To Straighten Ambil Odha Stream Valid: Bombay High Court

Reservation Must Reach Every Deserving Candidate, Cannot Be Eaten Away By Meritorious Reserved Category Candidate: J&K&L High Court

Not Necessary For All Tenants In Joint Tenancy To Find Alternate Accommodation For Landlord To Recover Possession U/S 13 Bombay Rents Act: Gujarat HC

“Crime Against Minor Girl Can Disturb Public Order Even If Committed In A Secluded Place”: Allahabad HC Upholds NSA Detention Order in Rape-Murder Case

Order 23 Rule 3 CPC | Vitiated Compromise Decree Can Be Recalled By Same Court, Separate Suit Challenging Such Decree Is Barred: J&K&L High Court

Injunction Order Can Be Stayed Only In Rare Cases Where Restoration Of Status Quo Ante At Interlocutory Stage Is Imperative For Justice: Delhi High Court

Keywords

Service Of Summons Mandatory, Debt Recovery

Tags: , , , ,