Supreme Court Directs States/UTs To Strictly Implement Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act 1979

Case: Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers

Coram: Justices Ashok Bhushan and MR Shah

Case No: [SMWP(C) 6/2020]

Court Observation: “We direct all the States/Union Territories to register all establishments and license all contractors under the Act, 1979 and ensure that statutory duty imposed on the contractors to give particulars of migrant workers is fully complied with”

“A legislation which has been enacted by the Parliament as a welfare measure for the migrant workers needs to be strictly implemented. The affidavits filed on behalf of different States and Union Territories does not give any facts and figures pertaining to the implementation of the Act. Non implementation of the Act adversely affects the rights of migrant workers. We, thus, are of the view that a direction need to be issued to the States/Union Territories to register all establishments and license all contractors under the Act and ensure that statutory duty imposed on the contractors to give particulars of the migrant workers is fully complied with. The competent authority while registering the establishments and granting license to the contractors may also impose conditions pertaining service condition, journey allowance and other facilities as set out in Chapter V of the Act.”

[doc id=6683]

Previous Posts

‘Legitimate Legislative Exercise’: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Laws Act 2019

Limitation Act Provisions Will Apply To Arbitration Proceedings Initiated Under Section 18(3) MSMED Act: Supreme Court

Wife Staying Abroad For Career Not ‘Cruelty’ To Husband Or ‘Desertion Of Spouse’: Bombay High Court

Husband’s Extra-Marital Partner Can’t Be Made Respondent In Domestic Violence Act Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

Kidnapping For Ransom – Necessary To Prove Threat To Cause Death Or Harm For Conviction Under Section 364A IPC: Supreme Court

Personal Service Of Contempt Notice Is An Essential Requirement Of Law; Service Through Office Not Sufficient: Allahabad High Court

Section 164(2) Companies Act Not Retrospective; Default Before 2014-15 FY Can’t Be Considered: Kerala High Court

Section 125 CrPC- “Obligation Of A Father To Maintain His Son Will Not Come To An End When He Attains Majority”: Delhi High Court Download Judgement

Keywords

Inter-State Migrant Workmen Act, Supreme Court, States/UTs, Strictly Implement