Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Punjab Security Of Land Tenures Act Civil Court Would Retain Jurisdiction In Cases Where the Landlord-Tenant Relationship Itself Is Disputed: Supreme Court

Punjab Security Of Land Tenures Act] Civil Court Would Retain Jurisdiction In Cases Where the Landlord-Tenant Relationship Itself Is Disputed Case: Assa Singh (D) By…

Continue ReadingPunjab Security Of Land Tenures Act Civil Court Would Retain Jurisdiction In Cases Where the Landlord-Tenant Relationship Itself Is Disputed: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Motor Accident Compensation: Claimants Entitled To ‘Future Prospects’ Even If Deceased Was Not Earning: Supreme Court

Motor Accident Compensation: Claimants Entitled To 'Future Prospects' Even If Deceased Was Not Earning Case: Meena Pawaia vs Ashraf Ali Coram: Justices MR Shah and…

Continue ReadingMotor Accident Compensation: Claimants Entitled To ‘Future Prospects’ Even If Deceased Was Not Earning: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Constitutional Court Can Direct CBI To Register Case Despite Its Decision To Close Preliminary Enquiry: Supreme Court

Constitutional Court Can Direct CBI To Register Case Despite Its Decision To Close Preliminary Enquiry Case: National Confederation of Officers Association of Central Public Sector…

Continue ReadingConstitutional Court Can Direct CBI To Register Case Despite Its Decision To Close Preliminary Enquiry: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Sec 7 POCSO – Main Ingredient Of Offence Of ‘Sexual Assault’ Is ‘Sexual Intent’ And Not ‘Skin To Skin” Contact: Supreme Court

Sec 7 POCSO - Main Ingredient Of Offence Of 'Sexual Assault' Is 'Sexual Intent' And Not 'Skin To Skin" Contact Case: Attorney General for India…

Continue ReadingSec 7 POCSO – Main Ingredient Of Offence Of ‘Sexual Assault’ Is ‘Sexual Intent’ And Not ‘Skin To Skin” Contact: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Restricting ‘Touch’ Or ‘Physical Contact’ Only To ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Absurd: Supreme Court Reverses Bombay HC’s POCSO Judgment

Restricting 'Touch' Or 'Physical Contact' Only To 'Skin To Skin' Contact Absurd Case: Attorney General for India versus Satish and another Coram: Justice Uday Umesh…

Continue ReadingRestricting ‘Touch’ Or ‘Physical Contact’ Only To ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Absurd: Supreme Court Reverses Bombay HC’s POCSO Judgment
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

‘Ambush PILs’ Filed To Preclude Genuine Litigants; Summary Dismissal Of Earlier Article 32 Petition Won’t Operate As Res Judicata: Supreme Court

'Ambush PILs' Filed To Preclude Genuine Litigants; Summary Dismissal Of Earlier Article 32 Petition Won't Operate As Res Judicata Case: National Confederation of Officers Association…

Continue Reading‘Ambush PILs’ Filed To Preclude Genuine Litigants; Summary Dismissal Of Earlier Article 32 Petition Won’t Operate As Res Judicata: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Conviction Based On Disclosure Statement Can Be Sustained Only When Resultant Recovery Is Unimpeachable: Supreme Court

Conviction Based On Disclosure Statement Can Be Sustained Only When Resultant Recovery Is Unimpeachable Case: Bijender @ Mandar vs State of Haryana Coram: CJI NV…

Continue ReadingConviction Based On Disclosure Statement Can Be Sustained Only When Resultant Recovery Is Unimpeachable: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Article 136 Interference Not Called For Merely Because A Different View About High Court’s Judgment Is Possible: Supreme Court

Article 136 Interference Not Called For Merely Because A Different View About High Court's Judgment Is Possible Case: State Of Kerala & Anr. V. M/S…

Continue ReadingArticle 136 Interference Not Called For Merely Because A Different View About High Court’s Judgment Is Possible: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Principle Of Initial Date Of Appointment Valid Principle To Determine Inter-Se Seniority In Absence Of Rules To Contrary: Supreme Court

Principle Of Initial Date Of Appointment Valid Principle To Determine Inter-Se Seniority In Absence Of Rules To Contrary Case: Sudhir Kumar Atrey vs Union of…

Continue ReadingPrinciple Of Initial Date Of Appointment Valid Principle To Determine Inter-Se Seniority In Absence Of Rules To Contrary: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Non-Residential Club Won’t Come Under MP Shops & Establishments Act Merely Because Food Supply Is There: Supreme Court

Non-Residential Club Won't Come Under MP Shops & Establishments Act Merely Because Food Supply Is There Case: P.B. Nayak And Ors. v. Managing Director, Bhilai…

Continue ReadingNon-Residential Club Won’t Come Under MP Shops & Establishments Act Merely Because Food Supply Is There: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

If Transfer Of Employee Results In Changing Conditions Of Service, Section 9A Of ID Act Will Be Applicable: Supreme Court

If Transfer Of Employee Results In Changing Conditions Of Service, Section 9A Of ID Act Will Be Applicable Case: Caparo Engineering India Ltd. V. Ummed…

Continue ReadingIf Transfer Of Employee Results In Changing Conditions Of Service, Section 9A Of ID Act Will Be Applicable: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Taluk Land Board’s Determination Has Evidentiary Value In Proceedings Under Kerala Private Forest Vesting Act: Supreme Court

Taluk Land Board's Determination Has Evidentiary Value In Proceedings Under Kerala Private Forest Vesting Act Case: State Of Kerala & Anr. V. M/S Popular Estates…

Continue ReadingTaluk Land Board’s Determination Has Evidentiary Value In Proceedings Under Kerala Private Forest Vesting Act: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Evidence In A Trial Against An Accused Does Not Have Any Bearing Upon A Co-Accused In A Separate Trial For The Commission Of Same Offence: Supreme Court

Evidence In A Trial Against An Accused Does Not Have Any Bearing Upon A Co-Accused In A Separate Trial For The Commission Of Same Offence…

Continue ReadingEvidence In A Trial Against An Accused Does Not Have Any Bearing Upon A Co-Accused In A Separate Trial For The Commission Of Same Offence: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Civil Dispute Given Colour Of Criminal Offence: Supreme Court Says Criminal Proceedings Should Not Become Weapons Of Harassment

Civil Dispute Given Colour Of Criminal Offence: Supreme Court Says Criminal Proceedings Should Not Become Weapons Of Harassment Case: Randheer Singh vs. State of UP…

Continue ReadingCivil Dispute Given Colour Of Criminal Offence: Supreme Court Says Criminal Proceedings Should Not Become Weapons Of Harassment
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Income Tax Act – Date Of Receipt Of Order Irrelevant For Computing Limitation Under Section 263(2): Supreme Court

Income Tax Act - Date Of Receipt Of Order Irrelevant For Computing Limitation Under Section 263(2) Case: Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs Mohammed Meeran…

Continue ReadingIncome Tax Act – Date Of Receipt Of Order Irrelevant For Computing Limitation Under Section 263(2): Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Judgment Debtor Can’t Raise Objections In Instalments; Res Judicata Applicable To Execution Proceedings: Supreme Court

Judgment Debtor Can't Raise Objections In Instalments; Res Judicata Applicable To Execution Proceedings Case: Dipali Biswas and others versus Nirmalendu Mukherjee and others Coram: Justices…

Continue ReadingJudgment Debtor Can’t Raise Objections In Instalments; Res Judicata Applicable To Execution Proceedings: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Consumer Complaint Not Maintainable Against Power Distributor For Raising Additional Bill Due To Short Assessment: Supreme Court

Consumer Complaint Not Maintainable Against Power Distributor For Raising Additional Bill Due To Short Assessment Case: M/S Prem Cottex v Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam…

Continue ReadingConsumer Complaint Not Maintainable Against Power Distributor For Raising Additional Bill Due To Short Assessment: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Section 138 NI Act: Complaint Cannot Be Proceeded With Once The Accused And Complainant Enter Into A Settlement Agreement: Supreme Court

Section 138 NI Act: Complaint Cannot Be Proceeded With Once The Accused And Complainant Enter Into A Settlement Agreement Case: Gimpex Private Limited vs Manoj…

Continue ReadingSection 138 NI Act: Complaint Cannot Be Proceeded With Once The Accused And Complainant Enter Into A Settlement Agreement: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Relief Against Third-Party Can’t Be Claimed In Proceedings Between Husband & Wife Under Hindu Marriage Act: Supreme Court

Relief Against Third-Party Can't Be Claimed In Proceedings Between Husband & Wife Under Hindu Marriage Act Case: Nitaben Dinesh Patel vs Dinesh Dahyabhai Patel Coram:…

Continue ReadingRelief Against Third-Party Can’t Be Claimed In Proceedings Between Husband & Wife Under Hindu Marriage Act: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Preliminary Enquiry By CBI In Corruption Cases Not Mandatory; Accused Cannot Demand It As Of Right: Supreme Court

Preliminary Enquiry By CBI In Corruption Cases Not Mandatory; Accused Cannot Demand It As Of Right Case: Central Bureau of Investigation vs Thommandru Hannah Vijayalakshmi…

Continue ReadingPreliminary Enquiry By CBI In Corruption Cases Not Mandatory; Accused Cannot Demand It As Of Right: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Anticipatory Bail Granted Ignoring Material Aspects, Nature & Gravity Of Offence Liable To Be Cancelled: Supreme Court

Anticipatory Bail Granted Ignoring Material Aspects, Nature & Gravity Of Offence Liable To Be Cancelled Case: Prashant Singh Rajput V. The State Of Madhya Pradesh…

Continue ReadingAnticipatory Bail Granted Ignoring Material Aspects, Nature & Gravity Of Offence Liable To Be Cancelled: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Employer Cannot Be Compelled To Appoint A Candidate Merely Because He Made Truthful Declaration Regarding Criminal Cases: Supreme Court

Employer Cannot Be Compelled To Appoint A Candidate Merely Because He Made Truthful Declaration Regarding Criminal Cases Case: Union of India vs. Mithu Meda Coram:…

Continue ReadingEmployer Cannot Be Compelled To Appoint A Candidate Merely Because He Made Truthful Declaration Regarding Criminal Cases: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Refund Of Stamp Duty Cannot Be Denied On Ground Of Delay If Application Got Belated Due To Judicial Proceedings: Supreme Court

Refund Of Stamp Duty Cannot Be Denied On Ground Of Delay If Application Got Belated Due To Judicial Proceedings Case: Mr.Rajeev Nowhar vs Chief Controlling…

Continue ReadingRefund Of Stamp Duty Cannot Be Denied On Ground Of Delay If Application Got Belated Due To Judicial Proceedings: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Section 138 NI Act – Summons To Directors Justified If Complaint Avers That They Were In Charge & Responsible For Conduct Of Business Of Company: Supreme Court

Section 138 NI Act - Summons To Directors Justified If Complaint Avers That They Were In Charge & Responsible For Conduct Of Business Of Company…

Continue ReadingSection 138 NI Act – Summons To Directors Justified If Complaint Avers That They Were In Charge & Responsible For Conduct Of Business Of Company: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Specific Performance – ‘Readiness’ & ‘Willingness’ Can’t Be Proved For First Time Before HC Through Affidavit Without Amending Pleadings: Supreme Court

Specific Performance - 'Readiness' & 'Willingness' Can't Be Proved For First Time Before HC Through Affidavit Without Amending Pleadings Case: K. Karuppuraj vs. M. Ganesan…

Continue ReadingSpecific Performance – ‘Readiness’ & ‘Willingness’ Can’t Be Proved For First Time Before HC Through Affidavit Without Amending Pleadings: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Part-Time Employees Can’t Seek Regularization As Matter Of Right Contrary To Govt’s Regularization Policy: Supreme Court

Part-Time Employees Can't Seek Regularization As Matter Of Right Contrary To Govt's Regularization Policy Case: Union of India and Ors v Ilmo Devi and Anr…

Continue ReadingPart-Time Employees Can’t Seek Regularization As Matter Of Right Contrary To Govt’s Regularization Policy: Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

Electricity Act – Additional Bill Raised By Distributor After Detecting Mistake Not Hit By 2 Years Limitation Under Section 56(2): Supreme Court

Electricity Act - Additional Bill Raised By Distributor After Detecting Mistake Not Hit By 2 Years Limitation Under Section 56(2) Case: M/S Prem Cottex v…

Continue ReadingElectricity Act – Additional Bill Raised By Distributor After Detecting Mistake Not Hit By 2 Years Limitation Under Section 56(2): Supreme Court
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit
Bank Doesn't Hold Customers Deposit

‘Fit Case To Be Included In Law School Syllabus’: Supreme Court On 5th Round Of Litigation Stalling Execution In 50 Yr. Old Suit

'Fit Case To Be Included In Law School Syllabus': Supreme Court On 5th Round Of Litigation Stalling Execution In 50 Yr Old Suit Case: Dipali…

Continue Reading‘Fit Case To Be Included In Law School Syllabus’: Supreme Court On 5th Round Of Litigation Stalling Execution In 50 Yr. Old Suit