Delhi High Court Rejects Future Group’s Plea Seeking Termination of Arbitration Proceedings With Amazon Before SIAC

Case: Future Coupons Private Limited & Ors. V. Amazon.Com Nv Investment Holdings Llc & Anr.

Coram: Justice C Hari Shankar

Case No.: CM (M) 1140/2022

Court Observation: “In such a case, the litigant has to wait till the final Award is passed and, only thereafter, can vent his grievances, both against the interlocutory as well as against the final Award,”

“Among the grounds of challenge – if, assuming, the award was against the petitioners and they chose to challenge it – could be included the grounds on which the petitioners seek to assail the impugned orders as well. Thus, the petitioners are not “remediless”. They have a remedy, but they have to bide their time,”

Previous Posts

No Intention To Harm Reputation: Calcutta High Court Quashes Defamation Case Against Reporter & Editor Of A Bengali Daily

Family Court Can Restore Application U/S 125 CrPC After Its Dismissal For Default: Orissa High Court

Income Tax Act does not impose any limitation for filing an application for condonation of delay: Kerala High Court

Child Born From Second Wife Of A Deceased Employee Eligible For Compassionate Appointment: Rajasthan High Court

‘Discretion’ Has No Place In Contractual Matters Unless It Is Expressely Incorporated In Contract: Supreme Court

S.134 Evidence Act | Testimony Of Single Eyewitness Can Form Basis For Conviction Provided It Is Of Sterling Quality: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Doctrine Of Group Of Companies, Can’t Implead Third Party To Arbitration: Delhi High Court

Keywords

Termination of Arbitration Proceedings