The Law of Agency: Revealing the Powers, Obligations, and Liabilities of Agents and Principals

  • Post category:Blog
  • Reading time:10 mins read

The Law of Agency: Revealing the Powers, Obligations, and Liabilities of Agents and Principals

Written by Samridhi Upadhyay

Table of Contents

Abstract

Agency law is a fundamental branch of contract and business law that regulates the relationship between an agent and a principal. The relationship enables one (the agent) to act in the name of another (the principal), and the creation of obligations and duties in accordance therewith. It is highly necessary to comprehend the roles, duties, and responsibilities of the agent and principal to ensure consistent business transactions without disputes in court. This article clarifies the basic principles of agency law, the extent of authority of the agent, his obligations towards the principal, and the liability the two of them might incur in varying circumstances. With the mention of essential legal provisions and milestone case laws, the article will attempt to provide a proper understanding of agency law and its applications.

Introduction

Agency law forms a crucial element of diverse dimensions of commercial transactions, labor laws, and representation under the law. In the relation of an agency, one person or organization (agent) can act in place of another (principal) for the purposes of forming legal relations with third parties. Agency relationship exists basically in business transactions, partnerships, labor, and even in simple transactions. Agency law, however, has its complexity, such as the scope of the power of an agent, his or her duty, and the effect of his or her act. This article explains the rules of agency law, its fundamentals, and its application in legal and commercial transactions.

The Law of Agency

Agency law is subject to contract and common law, which stipulates the roles and duties of principals and agents. The agency relationship may be established by express agreement, implied behavior, necessity, or even ratification of unauthorized acts. The components of an agency relationship are:

  1. Consent – Mutual assent by the agent and principal is necessary to establish the agency relationship.
  2. Authority – The agent should have legal authority to act on behalf of the principal, express or implied.
  3. Control – The principal should have control over the act of the agent within the limits of his authority.
  4. Good Faith – The parties should act in good faith and comply with their respective obligations.

Agency Types and Agent’s Powers Scope

Agents may be divided according to the power held by them and the scope of their mandate. The usual kinds of agency include:

  • General Agent – Is empowered with wide-ranging powers to execute transactions on behalf of the principal.
  • Special Agent – Is empowered with constrained powers limited to a single assignment or transaction.
  • Sub-Agent – Engaged by an agent for performing specific activities on behalf of the principal.
  • Del Credere Agent – Guarantees the contractual undertakings of the principal to third parties.

The authority of an agent rests upon the nature of the authority vested, which may be:

  1. Actual Authority – Granted by the principal either verbally or in writing.
  2. Implied Authority – From the agent’s position or duty.
  3. Apparent Authority – Where a third party believes that the agent is so authorized based on the conduct of the principal.
  4. Authority through Ratification – Where the principal ratifies unauthorized acts taken by the agent.

Agent’s Duties

An agent has a number of legal obligations to his or her principal, including being loyal and fulfilling conditions as promised. Such obligations include:

  • Duty of Care and Skill – The agent must possess reasonable care, skill, and diligence.
  • Duty of Loyalty – The agent must prioritize the interests of the principal and avoid conflicts of interest.
  • Duty to Obey Instructions – The agent must act within the authority granted and comply with legal instructions.
  • Duty to Give Information – The agent must provide all information necessary to the principal.
  • Duty to Account – The agent must keep accurate records of transactions and financial transactions.

Liabilities in Agency Law

Both the principals and agents are responsible for actions performed under the agency law. The liabilities may come about in various circumstances:

  • Liability of the Principal: Generally, the principal is liable for actions performed by the agent within the scope of the authority. This includes contractual liability and third-party claims.
  • Agent’s Liability: The agent may be held personally liable if they act outside the scope of the authority vested in them, are fraudulent, or do not indicate that they are acting on behalf of a principal.
  • Third-Party Liabilities: Where an agent falsely represents that they have authority when they do not, third parties may sue the agent or the principal, depending on the situation.

Case Laws on Agency Law

Certain significant cases demonstrate the enforcement of agency law principles:

  • Watteau v. Fenwick [1893] 1 QB 346 – Established the rule of apparent authority, wherein the principal became liable for actions taken by an agent in excess of their stated authority.
  • Freeman & Lockyer v. Buckhurst Park Properties Ltd [1964] 2 QB 480 – Established that a principal is liable for an agent’s act where third parties reasonably assumed the agent was acting with authority.
  • Lloyd v. Grace, Smith & Co. [1912] AC 716 – Decided that a principal is liable for an agent’s fraudulent acts if done within the scope of their authority.
  • Keighley, Maxsted & Co v. Durant [1901] AC 240 – Addressed the issue of ratification and held that a contract made by an agent beyond authority could only be ratified by a disclosed principal.
  • Panorama Developments (Guildford) Ltd v. Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Ltd [1971] 2 QB 711 – Established that a company secretary had apparent authority to bind the company in ordinary business transactions.

Whereas agency law is well established on the level of legal paradigm, there exist some challenges to its application in contemporary commercial dealings, such as:

  • Enhanced Sophistication of Business Transactions – Globalization has resulted in transnational agency relations, as well as issues relating to jurisdictions.
  • Computer and E-Transactions – Electronic contracts and internet shopping portals have stumped conventional agency roles, calling for modification of legal principles.
  • Corporate and Employee Misbehavior – Employers are often held liable for employees’ wrong acts on the basis of principles of vicarious liability.

Conclusions

The law of agency is a cornerstone of business and legal relations, establishing the rights and obligations of agents and principals. Having knowledge of the extent of agency powers, obligations, and possible liabilities, individuals and companies can remain in conformity and avoid litigations. Even as agency law continues to develop along with changing business practices, its foundations continue to play a key role in keeping contractual transactions honest and efficient. Further refinement of regulatory regimes as well as utilization of unambiguous agency agreements will continue to drive the effectiveness of this legal maxim.

References

  • Watteau v. Fenwick [1893] 1 QB 346.
  • Freeman & Lockyer v. Buckhurst Park Properties Ltd [1964] 2 QB 480.
  • Lloyd v. Grace, Smith & Co. [1912] AC 716.
  • Keighley, Maxsted & Co v. Durant [1901] AC 240.
  • Panorama Developments (Guildford) Ltd v. Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Ltd [1971] 2 QB 711.
  • Indian Contract Act, 1872.
  • Restatement (Third) of Agency, American Law Institute.

Tags: , , ,