Unlawful Possession Can’t Be Defended On The Ground That Eviction Clause In Statute Is Prospective In Nature
Case: Sashibhusan Das v. Lord Lingaraj Mahaprabhu & Anr.
Coram: Chief Justice Dr. S. Muralidhar & Justice Radha Krishna Pattanaik
Case No.: W.P.(C) No. 6120 of 2009
Court Observation: “A lawful right is always protected and cannot be taken away by an amendment brought into force at a later point of time. However, it does not mean that an unlawful possession which does not convey any right can still be defended on the ground that the Act to be prospective in nature. Unless, a possession is shown to be lawful, it has to be treated as unlawful as on the date when the amended Act came into force. Furthermore, it has to be treated as continuous wrong so long as the possession is unauthorized.”
Previous Posts
Arbitration Reference Not Maintainable If Filed After Admission Of Insolvency Resolution Petition U/s 7 IBC Download Judgement