Voluntary Retirement To Come Into Force Automatically On Expiry Of Notice Period If Appointing Authority Does Not Deny Permission: Gujarat High Court

Voluntary Retirement To Come Into Force Automatically On Expiry Of Notice Period If Appointing Authority Does Not Deny Permission

Case: Bhupendra Aatmaramdas Patel v. State of Gujarat

Coram: Justice Bhargav D. Karia

Case No.: C/SCA/7676/2017

Court Observation: “As per proviso to sub-rule (2) of Rule 48 of the Rules, 2002, if the appointing authority does not refuse to grant the permission for retirement before the expiry of the period specified in the said notice, the retirement shall become effective from the date of expiry of the said period. Thus, the petitioner having served three months’ notice for being retired w.e.f. 06.01.2014 and the same was not refused by the respondent-University, the petitioner is deemed to have retired with effect from the said date.”

“…if the appointing authority does not want to permit the employee to voluntarily retire from the effective date, it has to positively refuse to grant permission of retirement before the expiry of the period of three months specified in the notice.”

“…however in the facts of the case when the respondent-University could not have issued the charge-sheet after the petitioner has retired from the service, the delay and laches cannot come in the way of the petitioner as the action of the respondent-University for initiation of the departmental proceedings after voluntary retirement of the petitioner w.e.f. 06.01.2014 would be non-est and null and void from the beginning.”

Previous Posts

Motor Accident | Claimant Compensated By His Insurer Not Entitled To Compensation For Same Damages From Offending Vehicle’s Insurer: Kerala High Court

Children Are Not Toys At Administrators’ Mercy, Revising Kendriya Vidyalaya Guidelines After Commencement Of Admission Process Arbitrary: Kerala HC

Summary General Court Martial Can Try Cases Under POCSO Act, Must Protect Identity, Dignity & Psychology Of Victim Child: J&K&L High Court

Commissioner Can’t Allow Deposit Of Interest Payment In Instalments: Orissa High Court

Conduct Of Judges Noted & Observed, Must Not Act In Any Manner Which Gives Rise To Slightest Of Doubt In Minds Of Lawyers & Litigants: Delhi HC

Ossification Test Conducted On An Accused Cannot Be Conclusive To Declare Him As A Juvenile On The Date Of The Incident if His Age Around 40-55 Years Download Judgement