‘Caesar’s Wife Must Be Above Suspicion’: Delhi High Court Upholds Dismissal Of RBI Employee

‘Caesar’s Wife Must Be Above Suspicion’: Delhi High Court Upholds Dismissal Of RBI Employee

Case: Vijay Kumar Gupta V. Reserve Bank Of India & Ors

Coram: Justice Chandra Dhari Singh

Case No.: W.P.(C) 5453/2008

Court Observation: “As goes the popular saying – “Caesar’s wife must be above suspicion”. It is settled law that honesty of integrity of employees/officers working in the banks who are dealing with public money must be paramount,”

“In the departmental inquiry, the standard of proof is not that of a criminal case i.e., beyond reasonable doubt, rather the test applicable is that of merely the preponderance of probabilities,”

“The Appellate Authority while rejecting the appeal of the petitioner herein has passed a detailed and reasoned order after considering all the material and evidence on record before it. Hence, there is no illegality or error on the appellate order,”

“In view of the above discussion on facts as well as law, this Court does not find that there has been any procedural infraction or violation of Principles of Natural Justice in conducting the inquiry against the petitioner. It is also decided in the foregoing paragraphs that there is sufficient material on record to establish the guilt of the petitioner,”

Previous Posts

Gujarat Govt’s Policy Giving Preference To Domiciled Residents In Cadaveric Organ Transplant Unconstitutional: High Court

Delhi High Court Rejects Future Group’s Plea Seeking Termination of Arbitration Proceedings With Amazon Before SIAC

Adopted Child Entitled To Seek Compassionate Appointment: Karnataka High Court

Govt Should Not Allow Workers To Remain As Temporary Employees For An Unreasonably Long Time: J&K&L High Court

Vogue Readers Know It Doesn’t Run Any Institute, Confusion Unlikely: Karnataka High Court, Allows Vogue Institute Of Management To Retain Name

‘Neurostimulator Neither Treatment Nor Cure’: Kerala High Court Declares Teenager With 40% Disability Eligible For PwD Quota In KEAM Courses

Challenge Under Section 17 Of The SARFAESI Act Against Action Taken By Secured Creditor, Would Not Bar Arbitration Proceedings: Delhi High Court