No Disciplinary Action against Judicial Officer for Merely Passing a Wrong Order; Mere Negligence Not Misconduct: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

No Disciplinary Action against Judicial Officer for Merely Passing a Wrong Order; Mere Negligence Not Misconduct: Supreme Court

No Disciplinary Action against Judicial Officer for Merely Passing a Wrong Order; Mere Negligence Not Misconduct Case: Abhay Jain vs High Court of Judicature for…

Continue ReadingNo Disciplinary Action against Judicial Officer for Merely Passing a Wrong Order; Mere Negligence Not Misconduct: Supreme Court
NEET-UG | Students Domiciled in Maharashtra but Passing 10th/ 12th Standard from Outside Not Eligible to Avail State Quota: Bombay High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

NEET-UG | Students Domiciled in Maharashtra but Passing 10th/ 12th Standard from Outside Not Eligible to Avail State Quota: Bombay High Court

NEET-UG | Students Domiciled in Maharashtra but Passing 10th/ 12th Standard from Outside Not Eligible to Avail State Quota Case: Rachna Sanjay Kuwar v. The…

Continue ReadingNEET-UG | Students Domiciled in Maharashtra but Passing 10th/ 12th Standard from Outside Not Eligible to Avail State Quota: Bombay High Court
State Can Withhold DCRG Benefits of Convicted Employee despite Pendency of Criminal Appeal: Supreme Court Sets Aside Kerala HC Full Bench Judgment - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

State Can Withhold DCRG Benefits of Convicted Employee despite Pendency of Criminal Appeal: Supreme Court Sets Aside Kerala HC Full Bench Judgment

State Can Withhold DCRG Benefits of Convicted Employee despite Pendency of Criminal Appeal: Supreme Court Sets Aside Kerala HC Full Bench Judgment Case: Local Self…

Continue ReadingState Can Withhold DCRG Benefits of Convicted Employee despite Pendency of Criminal Appeal: Supreme Court Sets Aside Kerala HC Full Bench Judgment
District Judge Selection - 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

District Judge Selection – 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution: Supreme Court

District Judge Selection - 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution Case: High Court of Delhi v.…

Continue ReadingDistrict Judge Selection – 35 Years Minimum Age Limit Prescribed By High Courts Not Against Article 233 of Constitution: Supreme Court
Insurance Company Not Liable To Pay Compensation If Heavy Goods Vehicle Is Driven By Person Holding Light Motor Vehicle License: Karnataka High Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Insurance Company Not Liable To Pay Compensation If Heavy Goods Vehicle Is Driven By Person Holding Light Motor Vehicle License: Karnataka High Court

Insurance Company Not Liable To Pay Compensation If Heavy Goods Vehicle Is Driven By Person Holding Light Motor Vehicle License Case: Mahantesh v. Netharavati Coram:…

Continue ReadingInsurance Company Not Liable To Pay Compensation If Heavy Goods Vehicle Is Driven By Person Holding Light Motor Vehicle License: Karnataka High Court
Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence: Supreme Court

Party Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence Case:…

Continue ReadingParty Having Right of Appeal Does Not Have Corresponding Right to Insist For Consideration of Appeal by Forum That Was No Longer In Existence: Supreme Court
No Public Right Is Superior To Defence Of The Country: Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Challenge To Land Acquisition For ITBP Near LAC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

No Public Right Is Superior To Defence Of The Country: Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Challenge To Land Acquisition For ITBP Near LAC

"No Public Right Is Superior To Defence Of The Country": Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Challenge To Land Acquisition For ITBP Near LAC Case: Heera Singh Pangtey…

Continue ReadingNo Public Right Is Superior To Defence Of The Country: Uttarakhand HC Dismisses Challenge To Land Acquisition For ITBP Near LAC
Appointment under Outstanding Sportsperson Quota Can Be Made Only When There Is 'Direct Affiliation' With Indian Olympic Association: Rajasthan HC - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Appointment under Outstanding Sportsperson Quota Can Be Made Only When There Is ‘Direct Affiliation’ With Indian Olympic Association: Rajasthan HC

Appointment under Outstanding Sportsperson Quota Can Be Made Only When There Is 'Direct Affiliation' With Indian Olympic Association Case: Nisha v. State of Rajasthan Coram:…

Continue ReadingAppointment under Outstanding Sportsperson Quota Can Be Made Only When There Is ‘Direct Affiliation’ With Indian Olympic Association: Rajasthan HC
Section 138 NI Act - Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 138 NI Act – Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice: Supreme Court

Section 138 NI Act - Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice Case: Tedhi Singh…

Continue ReadingSection 138 NI Act – Complainant Not Expected To Initially Give Evidence of Financial Capacity Unless Accused Disputes It In Reply Notice: Supreme Court
Order 41 Rule 27 CPC - True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
Order 41 Rule 27 CPC - True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court

Order 41 Rule 27 CPC – True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court

Order 41 Rule 27 CPC - True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced Case: Sanjay…

Continue ReadingOrder 41 Rule 27 CPC – True Test Is Whether Appellate Court Can Pronounce Judgment without Considering Additional Evidence Sought To Be Adduced: Supreme Court
States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees' Family Life: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees’ Family Life: Supreme Court

States Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees' Family Life Case: SK Naushad Rahman and others vs Union of India Coram: Justice…

Continue ReadingStates Transfer Policy Must Give Consideration to Importance of Protecting Employees’ Family Life: Supreme Court
Section 173 CrPC - Magistrate Should Consider Initial Report & Supplementary Report Conjointly to Decide Whether to Proceed Against Accused: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 173 CrPC – Magistrate Should Consider Initial Report & Supplementary Report Conjointly to Decide Whether to Proceed Against Accused: Supreme Court

Section 173 CrPC - Magistrate Should Consider Initial Report & Supplementary Report Conjointly to Decide Whether to Proceed Against Accused Case: Luckose Zachariah @ Zak…

Continue ReadingSection 173 CrPC – Magistrate Should Consider Initial Report & Supplementary Report Conjointly to Decide Whether to Proceed Against Accused: Supreme Court
Article 226 - Writ Of Mandamus Virtually Granting Specific Performance Of Contract/Work Order Cannot Be Issued: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Article 226 – Writ Of Mandamus Virtually Granting Specific Performance Of Contract/Work Order Cannot Be Issued: Supreme Court

Article 226 - Writ Of Mandamus Virtually Granting Specific Performance Of Contract/Work Order Cannot Be Issued Case: Municipal Corporation Gondia vs Divi Works & Suppliers…

Continue ReadingArticle 226 – Writ Of Mandamus Virtually Granting Specific Performance Of Contract/Work Order Cannot Be Issued: Supreme Court
‘Breaking the Bias

‘Breaking the Bias’-An Open Talk: Uttar Pradesh Judicial Reforms Council of WICCI in collaboration with Pink Legal: Register By 8th March

Breaking the Bias To promote the importance of a world without prejudice, stereotypes, or discrimination, Uttar Pradesh Judicial Reforms Council of WICCI, in collaboration with…

Continue Reading‘Breaking the Bias’-An Open Talk: Uttar Pradesh Judicial Reforms Council of WICCI in collaboration with Pink Legal: Register By 8th March
Section 34 IPC Not Attracted When Final Outcome or Offence Committed is Distinctly Remote and Unconnected with Common Intention: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Section 34 IPC Not Attracted When Final Outcome or Offence Committed is Distinctly Remote and Unconnected with Common Intention: Supreme Court

Section 34 IPC Not Attracted When Final Outcome or Offence Committed is Distinctly Remote and Unconnected with Common Intention Case: Krishnamurthy @ Gunodu vs State…

Continue ReadingSection 34 IPC Not Attracted When Final Outcome or Offence Committed is Distinctly Remote and Unconnected with Common Intention: Supreme Court
Position Of Claimant Post Accident Relevant Factor To Determine Compensation Under Head Of Loss Of Amenities & Happiness: Supreme Court - The Law Communicants
The Law Communicants

Position Of Claimant Post Accident Relevant Factor To Determine Compensation Under Head Of Loss Of Amenities & Happiness: Supreme Court

Position Of Claimant Post Accident Relevant Factor To Determine Compensation Under Head Of Loss Of Amenities & Happiness Case: Benson George vs Reliance General Insurance…

Continue ReadingPosition Of Claimant Post Accident Relevant Factor To Determine Compensation Under Head Of Loss Of Amenities & Happiness: Supreme Court