No Interference U/A 227 Unless Lower Court Committed Manifest Error Or Decision Is Against Settled Principles Of Law
Case: K.V Shiraz v. Binny Emmatty
Coram: Justice Anil K Narendran and Justice P.G Ajithkumar
Case No.: O.P.(RC)NO.72 OF 2022
Court Observation: “No interference under Article 227 of the Constitution is called for unless this Court finds that the lower court or tribunal has committed a manifest error, or the reasoning is palpably perverse or patently unreasonable, or the decision of the lower court or tribunal is in direct conflict with settled principles of law.”
Previous Posts
Ad Hoc Appointments Can Be Made On Rotational Basis, Seniority Not A Criteria: Karnataka High Court
States Have No Power To Identify Socially & Educationally Backward Classes After 102nd Constitution Amendment: Supreme Court Holds By 3:2 Majority Download Judgement
Related Articles
- Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked Under Article 226 Against Decisions Of Lender/Banker Unless Compelling Reasons Like Statutory Violations: Kerala High Court
- Application of Section 89 CPC extends to disputes settled outside courts, encompassing proceedings before the Rent Control Court: Kerala High Court
- ‘Decision of Majority Decision Of House’: Kerala HC Rules That Minority Dissenter Of Municipal Council’s Resolution Cannot Invoke Article 226 To Challenge Same
