Commercial Court Cannot Be Regarded As A “Person Or Institution” Under Section 11(6) Of The A&C Act
Case: Uttam Energy Ltd. versus Ms. Shivratna Udyog Ltd.
Coram: Justice G.S. Kulkarni
Case No.: Arbitration Petition No. 79 Of 2022
Court Observation: “Thus, to read into sub-section (3) of Section 10 of the Commercial Courts Act to take within its ambit the jurisdiction and power in relation to the appointment of an arbitral tribunal, to be exercised by the Commercial Court exercising territorial jurisdiction over such arbitration, when the exclusive jurisdiction to make appointment of an arbitral tribunal within the meaning of section 11 of the ACA, is conferred on the High Court or the Supreme Court as the case may be under section 11 of the ACA, it would amount to a complete misreading of sub-section (3) of Section 10 of the Commercial Courts Act, and in fact would lead to an absurdity. Such an interpretation can never be accepted in terms of what Section 11 categorically provides qua the powers of the High Court to appoint an arbitral tribunal.”
“It would be absurdity to accept such argument inasmuch as the Commercial court would be a “Court” exercising judicial powers as clear from the provisions of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Thus, sub-section (6) of Section 11 of the ACA when uses the word “any person or institution” necessarily it would be a person or any institution which is not a Court and which would not have any judicial power and by virtue of such designation under sub-section (6-B) of Section 11, it shall not be regarded as a delegation of judicial power by the Supreme Court or the High Court.”
Previous Posts
Related Articles
- Bombay High Court (Full Bench) states that a victim cannot appeal under Section 14-A of the SC/ST Act for acquittal or bail in cases involving both POCSO and SC/ST Acts
- Regarding Section 60 of the Copyright Act, the Bombay High Court emphasizes that an inquiry into ‘groundless legal proceedings’ cannot conclusively determine the question of copyright infringement
- Bombay High Court Clarifies: Trial Court’s Decision on Refusing to Return or Reject a Plaint is Not Subject to Appeal under the Commercial Courts Act
