Motor Vehicles Act -Claimant Wheather Gratuitous Or Non- Gratuitous Cannot Fasten Liability On The Insurer Under The Provisions Of Motor Vehicles Act
Case: New India Assurance Co Vs Mehra Begum
Coram: Justice M A Chaudhary
Case No.: CMAM No.179/2012
Court Observation: “We, therefore, are of the opinion that the interest of justice will be subserved if the appellant herein is directed to satisfy the awarded amount in favour of the claimant, if not already satisfied, and recover the same from the owner of the vehicle. For the purpose of such recovery, it would not be necessary for the insurer to file a separate suit but it may initiate a proceeding before the executing court as if the dispute between the insurer and the owner was the subject-matter of determination before the Tribunal and the issue is decided against the owner and in favour of the insurer”.
Previous Posts
Inherent Power U/Sec 151 CPC Can Be Invoked Only When Alternate Remedies Do Not Exist: Supreme Court
Related Articles
- Considering an employee’s absence as ‘dies-non’ is a punitive measure that cannot be imposed without providing an opportunity for a hearing: J&K High Court
- Sec 125 CrPC | Muslim Husband Cannot Avoid His Liability To Maintain Unless Divorce Is Validly Pronounced And Properly Communicated: J&K&L High Court
- Domestic Violence Act | Proceedings Under Section 12 Of DV Act Cannot Be Equated With Lodging A Criminal Complaint: J&K&L High Court

