The Constitutional Validity Of Providing Multi-Member Representation From A Municipality Ward
Case: PARMAR SAMANTSINH UMEDSINH vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
Coram: Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy, and MR Shah
Case No.: Civil Appeal No. 706 OF 2021
Held: Articles 243R and 243S of the Constitution of India does not contain any limitation to the effect that there shall be only one member from one Ward, the bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, R. Subhash Reddy and MR Shah said while upholding the Gujarat High Court judgment dismissing the writ petitions challenging the provisions of the Act.
[doc id=3605]
Previous Posts
Married Hindu Can be a part of ‘Family Settlement’ With Parental Side Heirs
No Allegation That Promise To Marry Was False At The Inception: Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case
Punjab And Haryana HC Upholds Daughters Custody With Mother
Fee Charged By Private Medical Colleges Should Neither Be Excessive Nor Exploitative, Duty Of Admission & Fee Regulatory Committee To Ensure That Download Judgement
Keywords
Constitutional Validity, Municipality Ward, Multi-Member Representation