CrPC Section 220 – How To Decide If Two Or More Acts Form “Same Transaction” For Joint Trial? Supreme Court Explains

CrPC Section 220 – How To Decide If Two Or More Acts Form “Same Transaction” For Joint Trial? Supreme Court Explains

Case: Ms. P XXX v. State of Uttarakhand And Anr.

Corum: Justices Dinesh Maheshwari and Vikram Nath

Case No.: Criminal Appeal No. 903 of 2022

Court Observation: “However, even while pointing out that the question as to whether a series of acts are so connected together as to form the same transaction is purely a question of fact, this Court has indicated the core elements like proximity of time, unity or proximity of place, continuity of action and community of purpose or design, which are of relevant considerations and when these factors are applied to common sense and ordinary use of language, the vexed question of ‘same transaction’ could be reasonably determined.”

Previous Posts

S.33C Industrial Disputes Act Is For Execution Of Award, Labour Court Can’t Enter Adjudicatory Process To Decide Disputed Facts: Gujarat High Court

Dispute Arising Out Of Agreements Relating To Property Used Exclusively In ‘Trade & Commerce’ Constitutes “Commercial Dispute”: Gujarat High Court

Bombay High Court Warns Principal Chief Commissioners Of Customs For Non-Representation In Cases

Only A Food Inspector Can Investigate A Commission Of Offence Related To Food Items As Per The FSS Act: Gauhati High Court

Intention Of Parties A Key Factor To Ascertain Benami Transactions: Kerala High Court

Delay In Appointment Due To No Fault Of The Candidate Cannot Be Allowed To Result In Delayed Promotion: Gujarat High Court

Claim For Regularization Of Suspension Period Can’t Be Examined In Isolation Pending Challenge To Dismissal From Service: Gujarat High Court

Gift Deed Not Effective When Possession Not Handed Over; Can Be Cancelled: Madras High Court

‘Human Tendency To Wait For Missing Person’: Gujarat High Court Says Suit For Declaring Child Missing Since 1984 Dead Not Barred By Limitation

Undertrial Also Barred From Voting As Per Section 62(5) RP Act; Allowing Prisoners To Vote Doesn’t Strengthen Democracy: Bombay High Court

Supreme Court Bars Charging Compound Interest Or Penal Interest On Any Borrower During Loan Moratorium; Refuses Moratorium Extension Download Judgement

Keywords

CrPC Section 220, Same Transaction