Disciplinary Authority Of Parent Organization Can Issue Chargesheet Against Employee’s Misconduct In Borrowing Department

Case: N.D. Tyagi V. Power Finance Corporation Ltd. & Ors.

Coram: Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad

Case No.: LPA 373/2022

Court Observation: “Therefore, the learned Single Judge was justified in holding that as the writ petitioner was an employee of PFCL, he was temporarily posted to PFCCL, the charge sheet was rightly issued by competent disciplinary authority even though the misconduct was committed by him while serving PFCCL.”

“The statutory provisions quoted above makes it very clear that they relates to a period during which an employee is on deputation and would operate only during the tenure of service rendered by an employee in the borrowing entity. Once the employee is sent back to his parent department, it is the competent disciplinary authority of the parent organisation which can issue a charge sheet against the misconduct even though it has taken place in the borrowing department.”

“Resultantly, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The appeal is accordingly dismissed,”

Previous Posts

Kerala High Court Quashes Suspension Order Against College Professors Finding Their Suspension ‘Premeditated’

S.18 Drugs & Cosmetics Act: Jurisdiction To Try Offence Of Manufacturing Sub-Standard Drug Lies Where Sale Is Completed: Telangana High Court

Circumstances Not Put To An Accused Under Section-313Cr. P.C. Cannot Be Used Against Him: High Court Of Tripura

Reimbursement Of Medical Claim By Govt Employees Should Not Be Denied Mechanically: Gujarat High Court Reiterates

Mofussil Pleadings Are To Be Considered As A Whole, Liberally & Must Be Construed Reasonably: Tripura High Court

Bombay High Court Disallows Maratha Community Candidates To Avail Retrospective Benefits Under EWS Category In MSEDCL Recruitment Drive

Mere Presence Of Husband In House With Wife In A ‘Hanging Position’ Not Sufficient To Presume His Guilt: Tripura High Court

Adverse Entry Against Govt Servant In Confidential Report Can’t Be Acted Upon Without Furnishing It To Him To Enable Effective Representation: Tripura HC

Charge Framed Against Accused Must Be Established Beyond Any Shadow Of Doubt, Suspicion However Grave Not Proof: Tripura High Court

S.4 Contract Act | Party Can’t Dispute Legally Enforceable Liability Until ‘Communication’ Regarding Termination Of Contract Is Complete: Sikkim HC

Clause Every Effort To Arbitrate; Must Be Referred To Arbitration: Calcutta High Court

Keywords

Disciplinary Authority Of Parent Organization, Borrowing Department