High Court Under Article 226 And 227 Should Be Extremely Circumspect In Interfering With Orders Passed Under Arbitration Act

Case: Navayuga Engineering Company Vs. Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited

Coram: Justices RF Nariman and BR Gavai

Case No: [CA 1098-1099 OF 2021]

Court Observation: Despite this Court repeatedly referring to Section 5 of the Arbitration Act in particular and the Arbitration Act in general 2 and despite this Court having laid down in Deep Industries Ltd. Vs. ONGC & Anr. (2020) 15 SCC 706 that the High Court under Article 226 and 227 should be extremely circumspect in interfering with orders passed under the Arbitration Act, such interference being only in cases of exceptional rarity or cases which are stated to be patently lacking in inherent jurisdiction, we find that High Courts are interfering with deposit orders that have been made. This is not a case of exceptional rarity or of any patent lack of inherent jurisdiction.

[doc id=4618]

Previous Posts

Nothing On Record To Even Remotely Suggest That The Act Was Consensual: Supreme Court Upholds Rape Conviction

Quality Of Reasons Matters The Most: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted To Accused In Dowry Death Case

Hindu Undivided Family – No Presumption That Business Run By Karta In Tenanted Premise Is Joint Family Asset

Poverty Of Accused Is Not A Mitigating Factor While Awarding Punishment Under NDPS Act

Delhi High Court Rejects Britannia’s Plea Of Trademark Infringement Against ITC’S Sunfeast Digestive Biscuits

Private Doctors Submitting Sketchy Medical Reports To Courts Are Guilty Of Fabricating False Evidence

Petition Styled As One Under Article 226 Would Not Bar High Court To Exercise Its Jurisdiction Which Otherwise It Possesses

Acquittal Based On Benefit Of Doubt In Serious Crime Cannot Make Candidate Eligible For Public Employment

Seriousness Of Charge Relevant Factor: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted To Man Accused Of Murdering Lady Doctor

‘Proclaimed Offender’ Declaration Under Section 82(4) CrPC Cannot Be Made Against Person Accused Of Sections 406, 420 IPC Download Judgement