In Absence Of Any Resistance Or Alarm It Cannot Be Said Victim Was Kidnapped: Calcutta High Court Acquits Two
Case: Mangal Das Adhikary Vs. The State of West Bengal With Connected Matter
Coram: Justice Sugato Majumdar
Case No.: CRA 226 of 2015
Court Observation: “She is a grown up girl. She did not raise any hue and cry or ask for rescue to any person of the bus including the conductor.”
“Evidences adduced on behalf of the prosecution suffer from serious contradictions, incongruous and inconsistencies which the Trial Court failed to take notice. There was a flawed appreciation of evidence on the part of the Trial Court. Therefore, the findings demands interference of this Court and are liable to be set aside.”
Previous Posts
Income Tax Dept. Can’t Withhold Refunds In Mechanical And Routine Manner: Delhi High Court
Amendment To Section 36(1)(va) Of Income Tax Act Is Prospective In Nature: Delhi High Court
Conviction Solely On The Basis Of Extra Judicial Confession Cannot Be Sustained: Supreme Court
Keywords
Absence Of Any Resistance, Victim Was Kidnapped
Related Articles
- The customary use of ‘Silk’ to denote a paint’s finish cannot be protected as a trademark, rules the Calcutta High Court, dismissing Berger’s plea against JSW Paints
- Company Taking Calculated Business Risk Cannot Challenge Root Of Contract Merely Due To Change In Tax Laws: Calcutta HC Denies GST Refund
- Unless Order Of Demolition Specifically Indicates Extent Of Unauthorised Construction, It Cannot Be Implemented: Calcutta HC
