Intention Of Parties A Key Factor To Ascertain Benami Transactions: Kerala High Court

Intention Of Parties A Key Factor To Ascertain Benami Transactions

Case: C.C Joy v. C.D Mini & Anr.

Coram: Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque and Justice Sophy Thomas

Case No.: MAT.APPEAL NO.242 OF 2012

Court Observation: “When husband purchases property as part of his real estate business joining his wife as a name lender in the title document, even availing bank loans in her name to pay the consideration, it cannot be said that the purchase was for the benefit of the wife, when there is clear evidence to prove the benami nature of the transaction. But when there is evidence to show that the husband purchased the property or executed document in favour of his wife, unless the contrary is proved, it will be treated as the property of the wife purchased for her benefit.”

“The intention of the parties is a key factor in determining the nature of the transaction, which could be gathered from the relationship between parties, their conduct previous and subsequent to the transaction, source of money for purchase, possession of the property, possession of the title documents, repayment of loan, etc. etc.”

“If it is found that the person in whose name the property stands was only a name lender, and the property was actually purchased for the benefit of the beneficial owner, expending his own money, then of course, the benamidar may not get any right, title or interest over the properties held in his/her name.”

Previous Posts

Claim For Regularization Of Suspension Period Can’t Be Examined In Isolation Pending Challenge To Dismissal From Service: Gujarat High Court

Gift Deed Not Effective When Possession Not Handed Over; Can Be Cancelled: Madras High Court

‘Human Tendency To Wait For Missing Person’: Gujarat High Court Says Suit For Declaring Child Missing Since 1984 Dead Not Barred By Limitation

Undertrial Also Barred From Voting As Per Section 62(5) RP Act; Allowing Prisoners To Vote Doesn’t Strengthen Democracy: Bombay High Court

Objective Of Investigation Is To Unearth Truth, IO Can’t Throw Out Material Evidence Produced By Accused By Merely Citing S.91 CrPC: J&K&L High Court

S.19 Prevention Of Corruption Act | ‘Failure Of Justice’ Is A Facile Expression, Courts Must Be Circumspect While Determining It: Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Bars Charging Compound Interest Or Penal Interest On Any Borrower During Loan Moratorium; Refuses Moratorium Extension Download Judgement